LANDAU LIMITED
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2015
- Messages
- 466
I'm not talking about a roller lifter coming apart or a part inside of it becoming magnetized. I'm specifically talking about flat tappet cams and lifters and them chewing each other up. It looks like you're saying that possible cam and lifter failure is one of the reasons on your list of reasons for choosing a roller cam over a flat tappet cam but not the only one. The major reason that I'm spreading this information is so that people can come to the realization that that shouldn't even be on your list of reasons for choosing a roller cam over a flat tappet cam. It's the oil not the inherent design of the flat tappet Cams and lifters that has caused all these problems.
I rebuilt a transmission for a guy about 5 years ago and after he put it in his car he came back to visit me so that I could see his car but the thing that impressed me the most was how quiet his stock engine ran and it seemed like it was idling at about 750 RPMs. The one thing I don't like about roller cams in our Buicks is the lifters and more specifically that link bar that absolutely is going to rattle and make noise so now you've got increased valve train noise but that wasn't enough for me I also had to choose some xfi lobes which I regret because that brought the noise level up to another level but still not objectionable but I sure did envy the sound of his engine.
Flat tappets are destined for failure period no matter what oil you use. There's way too much working against them. Why doesn't OEM run flat tappet cams? Talk about cost savings. I'll take the noise...if their even noisy. I haven't set one up yet but I will be in the near future. Won't be in my buick it'll be in a BBC. So I'll see just how noisy they are.