You can type here any text you want

Launching and Timing with TT alky chip

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

murphster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
1,115
Since last year I noticed a feature of the TT alky chips and have recently tried out some new chips from Eric. I think the results will benefit a lot of people at the track with TT alky chips. I think Eric is working on a fix for those who race with the alky chips.

After going through some of my Directcan logs from my clone last year after being disappointed with the 60fts, I noticed that I wasn't getting full timing on the launch and it was adding it in after a little delay. I figured this wasn't that good for the an optimal 60ft. The TT alky chips, at least the recent ones, pull timing until a short delay after the MAF is maxed out. This is done to prevent transitional knock on the street as an instant rise in timing can give some knock if you go WOT quickly when using alky.

After reviewing lots of logs, I noticed that the delay would be pretty bad on a softer launch. On a very high boost launch, the delay would be much shorter as the MAF maxed out a lot sooner. My GN plus two other cars I know were running alky on a non alky TT chip. The non alky chips didn't have the timing delay and these cars also 60ft'd very well. My GN had a 1.58 60ft on the street chip with a stock turbo, but my clone barely got into the 1.6 60fts on a TE44.

Here are some Directscan screengrabs showing the timing delay. The first picture shows the timing (Spark Advace) at 18.6 degrees on the launch. The chip was set to 25/22 timing but didn't get to 25 degree timing until I was at 17mph, as shown in the second picture. The third picture is a screengrab where the timing didn't come in until I was at 25mph.

I got another chip from Eric where there was no timing delay based on MAF. I did notice some transitional knock on the street, so I turned up the initial gain inside the PAC box on my alkycontrol setup and also set the turnon point a little sooner. The alky light turns over from red to green much sooner and the tansitional knock is almost non existant on the street now. The last picture is a screengrab with my new TT alky chip with no timing delay and is the run from my clone in the sig from yesterday. The timing was set to base 23/21 and full timing was there way before I launched and there was no knock whatsoever.

On the old chip, my best 60ft was a 1.64 with most of the 60fts high 1.6s to low 1.7s. On the new chip, my best 60ft is 1.53 with most of the 60ft being mid 1.5s to low 1.6s. The main difference between the chips was that on the old chip with the timing delay, I had to leave with a lot of boost but it still didn't hit hard because the timing wasn't there. Sometimes I could feel the timing kick in when I was 20ft out. The new chip hits a lot harder off the line and I think I'll be in the 1.4s soon in my clone on a TE44 after 1.55 and 1.53 60fts yesterday with a lot of room to launch harder.

I would like to thank Eric from TT for his help on this and always working to make the best chips better.
 

Attachments

  • old TT chip launch 3.JPG
    old TT chip launch 3.JPG
    64.1 KB · Views: 596
  • old TT chip 17mph 3.JPG
    old TT chip 17mph 3.JPG
    57.5 KB · Views: 600
  • old TT chip 25mph 3.JPG
    old TT chip 25mph 3.JPG
    58.8 KB · Views: 587
  • new TT chip 3.JPG
    new TT chip 3.JPG
    64.9 KB · Views: 624
Between the chips have you seen a MPH gain in the 1/8 and 1/4? Also what about the 1/8 to 1/4 pickup?
 
even my street chip does this.... I just figured out this week I think I was adding timing trying to get it to spool faster but in reality its spooling so fast Im spinning the tires 10-15 feet out.... Im changing the entire setup on the car right now so I cant confrim if this is true or not but thats what it appeared to be doing from the logs.
 
Do you launch off of a trans brake or foot brake?
Thanks
Coach

Trans brake. When launching off the footbrake you get the same effect. Even worse if you launch real soft. There can be kind of a benefit because it almost works like traction control since it softens the launch. Not good for killer 60fts though.
 
even my street chip does this.... I just figured out this week I think I was adding timing trying to get it to spool faster but in reality its spooling so fast Im spinning the tires 10-15 feet out.... Im changing the entire setup on the car right now so I cant confrim if this is true or not but thats what it appeared to be doing from the logs.

I haven't seen a non alky chip do this, and it doesn't make sense. The alky chip only initially pulls the timing down to street timing anyway (19 degrees).
 
I noticed the same problem in my car. Timing would drop to 18° or so and then go back up on a softer launch. Also my car is going rich in the top of third before the traps. I can watch the A/FR drop going down the track. Ive been thinking about getting a new chip so maybe I'll ask Eric to change a few things.
 
Unless it was burned as a alky chip and I never knew (with the timing set default low) I dont know what to tell you.. Il try and get some screen shots once I am home later on this week.
 
with my early alky chips (5.3-5.4-5.5) at launch had 1 degree over whatever i set for 1-2 timing and it would remain +1 through first gear , (spoolup was at 22* on the foot brake standing still )
it would run 28* through 1st ,27* in second and 25* in third .. with all the timing i could add (+4 over base 23/21)

i will tell you that i set huber up on a 5.6 street chip (non alky) , maybe i can get him to snap a pic of his run on DS
 
Interesting find. Just reviewed a powerlog file from Saturday & noticed the same thing on a TT alky chip. Had 18.7 degrees up until somewhere between 11 & 16 mph, then it kicked it up to 24:confused:
 
Interesting find. Just reviewed a powerlog file from Saturday & noticed the same thing on a TT alky chip. Had 18.7 degrees up until somewhere between 11 & 16 mph, then it kicked it up to 24:confused:

Nothing to worry about. All TurboTweak alcohol chips operate that way, for the last 8 years. Murphster is not describing a problem, just something he found may have helped his car 60' better, but is more aggressive and likely to cause knock on the street for most cars.

Eric
 
As the OP stated, its to keep the cars from having transitional knock retard. If he didn't do it that way, people would be inside the little black box making changes and screwing the settings up. If the owner feels confident in his or her tuning abilities, ask for the delay removed and try your luck like he did. Just please dont go blaming Eric or Julio if it doesnt make you happy.:p
 
Thanks Eric. Problem here is the track prep I guess. Tubular Upper & lower rear control arms, drag shocks front & rear, removed my front sway & have an ATR in the back, my GN won't 60' the way it should. Keep messing around with the tuning and have raised my MPH, just can't get the ET that should match:frown:
 
what is your best 60 foot roc87? also what shocks are you running? and a little info on the combo still the same as your sig?
 
what is your best 60 foot roc87? also what shocks are you running? and a little info on the combo still the same as your sig?

Best 60' ever was a 1.71; 36mm hollow front sway bar attached, cheap monroe front shocks, nitro drop rear shocks (from previous owner when it had drop springs, but stock springs are installed), tubular uppers & lowers, ATR rear bar & 26x15x10.5 ET Streets. Last year suspension exactly the same with the 275/55/16 M&H Drag radials it did a 1.73. This year I dropped the front sway, front shocks are competition engineering 90/10's, rears are summit brand 50/50's. Got a 1.77 on the first run of the day, then seemed to progressively get worse. Tires are 3 years old also, so thats an issue. I'm thinking I'll get a set of 28" tall hoosier quick times. I have a PTS extreme 9/11 3200 stall. Everything else in the sig is the same.
 
Back
Top