at 3600lbs your going to need over 750+rwhp to go mid 9s well over 800 at the crank,more with higher elevation.boost is just a number..I couldn't find how much boost he was running?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!at 3600lbs your going to need over 750+rwhp to go mid 9s well over 800 at the crank,more with higher elevation.boost is just a number..I couldn't find how much boost he was running?
I guess it's time for me to start losing weight [emoji16]at 3600lbs your going to need over 750+rwhp to go mid 9s well over 800 at the crank,more with higher elevation.boost is just a number.
just turn it upI guess it's time for me to start losing weight
Thanks Pronto .picking up a alky control set up todayWallace racing has a calculator for elevation. Looks like you'll lose about 50hp which you should be able to make up with higher boost.
My car weighed 3535 lbs with me in it. Brian Cotton (my buddy who drove it) weighs about 25 lbs more than I do. This put the car at a race weight of about 3560 lbs.I guess it's time for me to start losing weight [emoji16]
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
It was about 3800lbs with a stock location intercooler. He's looking to drop a few tenths with a front mount and more boost.I know of 2 specific cars in my area that are solid 9 second cars. Not flea weights either. One is a 109 stroked block the other a Stage. Both are built with the right supporting parts and full safety equipment to run in the 9s. Both run 93 plus alky. Both run the FAST system. One previously ran 9s on a chip. One is tuned by Cal. The other by Bison I believe. The tunes are not on the edge. Boost in the low 20s. Both have much more left for max. These cars are very reliable, one is street driven thousands of miles a year. Both taken to the track. From what you saying you have, you should have NO problem running 9s with all the supporting parts and safety equipment. Bottom line for not blowing head gaskets is tune and no system failures regardless if on race gas, E85 or alky injection. Cal tuning it will be a giant step in the right direction. Even the best built engine can be taken down by a system failure at that performance level.
Wallace racing has a calculator for elevation. Looks like you'll lose about 50hp which you should be able to make up with higher boost.
It was about 3800lbs with a stock location intercooler. He's looking to drop a few tenths with a front mount and more boost.
I've seen the same though it's only been 2000-3000" vs sea level comparison. It doesn't really matter much unless you are close to all in with the turbo. If all in the air can make quite a bit of difference. Tune spot on for both. 330' time better at the sea level track.My experience at elevation (Bandimere -> Bradenton), I could trap about the same with the same boost (hair faster at sea level) but took a lot longer to spool up at altitude.
HandR upper and lower control arms adjustable ,ta girdle, a big ol fat rear sway bar , Moser axles an Eaton posi C clip eliminators air bags under Springs and some other stuff from H&R like polyurethane bushings . Mickey Thompson 28 inch tall soft wall slicks 10 wide. when I raced before with my 109 Stroker I ran Med tens 60 foot times were in the 1.48 rangeI've seen no mention as to what is done in the suspension end of things.....