By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!But most of the cars that I see with 224/224 type cams a mainly used for track purposes. I'm going to take my car to the track to tune and most likely take it back when I redo my rear/suspension and crank the boost up but other than that I'll be on the street. Soooo?????
Rell87 what are specs on you'r cam?
Don't be afraid to let that engine breathe.
guys he stated he'd like to make the power at 6000, its not rocket science to do so... he is not trying to be a "big playa" lol. This is turned into a silly thread talking about how one guys stick is bigger than the other but nobody will give out the actual measurments so its all useless drivel. How much money is into the heads just to make them deal with the kind of lift ya'll are running? How many miles driven on the street would it take before the valve springs needed to be changed? With a stroked 4.1 I would think something in the 220+ range with .560 lift would be great for 6000, hell even a tad smaller in in the 215/220 range should not be dropping off in power substantially till 6000.
guys he stated he'd like to make the power at 6000, its not rocket science to do so... he is not trying to be a "big playa" lol. This is turned into a silly thread talking about how one guys stick is bigger than the other but nobody will give out the actual measurments so its all useless drivel. How much money is into the heads just to make them deal with the kind of lift ya'll are running? How many miles driven on the street would it take before the valve springs needed to be changed? With a stroked 4.1 I would think something in the 220+ range with .560 lift would be great for 6000, hell even a tad smaller in in the 215/220 range should not be dropping off in power substantially till 6000.
I agree with this. 218 would get it done. LSA has a tremendous effect on low rpm function. More degrees will have better idle and low rpm quality but wont peak like more overlap will at higher rpm. 224 with 112 LSA or 224 with 108 LSA. Big difference and when the cam specs are based on 1.55 rockers and you are running a steeper ratio it could aggravate the problem if you want streetability.guys he stated he'd like to make the power at 6000, its not rocket science to do so... he is not trying to be a "big playa" lol. This is turned into a silly thread talking about how one guys stick is bigger than the other but nobody will give out the actual measurments so its all useless drivel. How much money is into the heads just to make them deal with the kind of lift ya'll are running? How many miles driven on the street would it take before the valve springs needed to be changed? With a stroked 4.1 I would think something in the 220+ range with .560 lift would be great for 6000, hell even a tad smaller in in the 215/220 range should not be dropping off in power substantially till 6000.
I'm not as experienced as you big guys but I have a question. When the cam was installed was it straight up, advanced, or retarded? That might make a difference.
Hmmm. 240+. Some people are learning something. Sounds like you've got a fun ride there. You need a bigger turbo though.kill joy!
I tried a couple 224/224 hyd rollers in one of my 3.8 builds. Some would make power to 6500, others dropped off quickly at ~5800. Ramp rates, advanced/retarded, LSA, etc... really make or break a cam. I would suggest going over the cam card with a knowledgeable engine builder and seeing if the cam is right for your RPM goal.
Don-- It's bigger then 240
The cars good! Did a complete redo over last summer, rewire, fuel system, motor, tranny, list goes on and on, pretty much everything. I don't think my little 70 turbo can keep up with you. Now if your thinking bracket race, its on!
Yes it will make a difference. The cam may have advance ground into it. That is why they supply a cam card