By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Without a wind component passing over the wing the airplane will not achieve flight..IAS(Indicated airspeed) is measured by ram air passing through a pitot tube...if plane is stationary there will not be an IAS. If the wheels on the plane are moving and the tread can match the speed at which the wheels turn..the aircraft will not move. If you had a very light aircraft and did the tread test into the wind on a windy day 30+ knots..It might be possible for the plane to leave the ground IF the plane was configured for a short field takeoff..:smile:
I wonder how long it will go this time?
You pose a few good points, you are wrong but there are good points. :biggrin:
IAS is measured when the plane is moving forward because the engine are pushing it forward. The wheel will match the treadmill, true, but the plane in relation to the air around it is moving forward because of the engine thrust. Therefore you will get IAS and the plane when reaches the necessary IAS it will fly.
Depends on how long it takes the flight crew to convince the ground crew I guess.
When is the meet again this year? I need to make plans to attend again. This time I will make sure my tires are in good shape.
However U cant argue that the string threw the straw wont create the slightest bit of resistance, which is all thats needed to start forward motion. Once it gets going it will continue to build speed. The experiment needs to have the string moving in exact reverse motion to the treadmill. Like I said lose the string and I will admit defeat.
The airplane will take off. God help the wheel bearings as they will be spinning twice as fast as the required take off speed. Say the recommended take off speed is 100kts. The airplane will accelerate into the relative wind no matter what the landing gear is doing because the thrust provided by the engines is acting on the air, not the ground. When the aircraft is traveling at 100kts indicated, the ground speed at the treadmill will be 200kts. (the landing gear wheels will be spinning at a speed of 200kts) Similarly, if the aircraft was held in place somehow and had a 100kt headwind, it could take off even if the wheels on the gear were not rotating.
I love this argument. It is amusing to me because I know that I am right and the grounded guys are wrong. It is a simple thing that people over complicate.
I didn't bother reading many of the posts on this subject. Honestly, I can even imagine why this is even being debated.
OF COURSE THE PLANE WILL TAKE OFF!!!!
The ONLY thing the treadmill will do is increase the rpm of the plane's wheels when it takes off. The plane will still develop the EXACT same forward velocity in the exact same amount of time as it would if there were no treadmill. The wheels will be spinning faster, that's the only difference!
The planes engines (doesn't matter if it's a turbine engine, propeller or even a rocket engine) generate thrust against the *air*, NOT THE GROUND!
I like the MythBusters show, but all too often I find myself shaking my head at their methods and at some of the questions they attempt to "answer".![]()
It will FLY it does have to over come some of the treadmill force but as long as it picks up the air flow and go faster then the treadmill is moving and get to air speed before it runs out of treadmill then up it goes![]()
Lets put another twist on this How is it possible for the speed of the treadmill to match the speed of the plane.
It seems to me it would be impossible for the plane not to move.
The rest of the equation is just smoke and mirrors.
The part that gets me is how the air moves fast enough under the wings to create lift. The engines apply the thrust to the wing/fuselage by moving air, but doesn't move air under/over the wings.