I was aware of the impending veto, but I know the issue was bigger than that and that Bush would do the right thing. Like I said, the support would be an asset, but the entire situation didn't hinge on it. Like Bush said, the security council has failed in it's task, due to individual members supporting their own interests instead of acting like a council. That didn't mean the US wouldn't step up and take care of business. What I meant, but worded poorly, was in reference to them as a military power, not their UN standing.
On the Lellouche quote, I'd say that's about typical. That's the rationalization you hear from people directly supporting Saddam too. Seems to be a blanket arguement thrown out there when someone else is too scared to do what's right. Heard that Australia is even committing troops now, even though they somewhat opposed action. At least they know that time for talking is over, and even if they didn't get their way, it's time to commmit to getting it over with ASAP and lend a hand.