dezldave961
2004 Turbo Regal
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2020
- Messages
- 147
Sounds like you're on the right track (pun intended)!
I scan my WBO2 and MAF values during boost (when in PE/OL). The average % diff I see from commanded A/F and WB A/F is applied to corresponding MAF values from the scan. My VE table is bone stock, even with a fairly lumpy cam. I may decide to tune that separately, once everything else is dialed-in on the new setup, just for giggles.
If you copied over most of the SC table values, and started there, it's fairly simple. (Intense popped a handful of engines with their tune's back in the day.) Most top-swap cars I tuned without a SC variant (ex. 2000-02 Impala's/Monte's) ran solid doing that. The MAP is content maxxing at 100 kPa, and just monitoring the MAF/O2 for normal operation, and it gets simpler to just the MAF in PE.
AFC is a must-have for skewing MAF table down, but if you start running into the 511 g/s limit, you can change the Injector Flow Rate lower to shift that, and re-tune 5-10% at a time.
I scan my WBO2 and MAF values during boost (when in PE/OL). The average % diff I see from commanded A/F and WB A/F is applied to corresponding MAF values from the scan. My VE table is bone stock, even with a fairly lumpy cam. I may decide to tune that separately, once everything else is dialed-in on the new setup, just for giggles.
If you copied over most of the SC table values, and started there, it's fairly simple. (Intense popped a handful of engines with their tune's back in the day.) Most top-swap cars I tuned without a SC variant (ex. 2000-02 Impala's/Monte's) ran solid doing that. The MAP is content maxxing at 100 kPa, and just monitoring the MAF/O2 for normal operation, and it gets simpler to just the MAF in PE.
AFC is a must-have for skewing MAF table down, but if you start running into the 511 g/s limit, you can change the Injector Flow Rate lower to shift that, and re-tune 5-10% at a time.