My experience with the CK kit (I usually use my own setup) is I bought one to try in a local customers trans earlier this year. Worked great. I was happy with it.
I installed one in a trans I built for a customer who bought the kit and hard parts from CK, It also seemed to work very well although I didn't get as much seat time in that car as it was a quick R&R and rebuild on a weekend to save a guy two trips from central TX.
I got to ride in a RX7 V8 car with a complete CK trans that I setup the TV cable for a local customer. The CK trans seemed to work excellent in that car (car was neat anyway being so light with plenty of power).
3 experiences in the last 6 months or so, all positive.
PTS's kit, one experience was enough for me and at the time I was studying all the different 200-4R valve bodies and kits I could get my hands on.
Maybe they made a mistake on the plate on mine but I had a tie-up and it wasn't a clearance issue.
Maybe Bruce's kit is geared for a stock trans with 2 frictions in the OD pack but I don't need or want the trans to shift to 4th with no accumulation.
Seems like a good way to break OD ring gears and carriers to me.
I can even deal with the tie-up issue but the machining on the .570 boost valve...
I've worked as a machinist and lets just say it was disappointing. Very rough machining for such a critical component.
The Chinese are getting no-name crankshafts cleaner than that.
I would say your limited experience with CK's product may have been caused by a bad installation or other issue. It wasn't the recal kit anyway.
In all honestly, most of the 200-4R kits do about the same thing, some go about it a different way.
Some guys like a brutal shift, and if so, then the PTS kit will be the one to get you there, but almost all experienced trans builders know that a firm, crisp shift without being brutal is what the goal should be.