turbojimmy
Supporting Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2001
- Messages
- 5,560
Hi all,
As some of you may know, I had to have my engine rebuilt due to a horrific beating by our old friend Mr. Detonation. I need a crankshaft, 2 pistons and a few connecting rods. As some of you may also know, a steel stroker crank with stock, narrow journal bearings are more rare than hen's teeth right now. I can't stare at my torn apart car until July when they become available again so I need to do something now.
I found a vendor with a wide journal stroker crank and .040 overbore stroker pistons in stock. They're currently looking for rods (rods will be spendy).
What are the pros and cons of a wide journal crank (besides the obvious cost difference)? Should I just forget about it and put it together w/out the stroker (the engine guy has another stock crank, pistons and rods for me)?
I'm hung up on the stroker because I like the idea of more displacement (and thus torque/power) at the low end (un-boosted). The only complaint I have about my car is waiting (even if it's a couple of seconds) for the turbo to spool in order to get any power. Does the additional displacement from a stroker make much of a difference? The substitute for the cubic inches is boost at the higher end, right?
Thanks,
Jim
As some of you may know, I had to have my engine rebuilt due to a horrific beating by our old friend Mr. Detonation. I need a crankshaft, 2 pistons and a few connecting rods. As some of you may also know, a steel stroker crank with stock, narrow journal bearings are more rare than hen's teeth right now. I can't stare at my torn apart car until July when they become available again so I need to do something now.
I found a vendor with a wide journal stroker crank and .040 overbore stroker pistons in stock. They're currently looking for rods (rods will be spendy).
What are the pros and cons of a wide journal crank (besides the obvious cost difference)? Should I just forget about it and put it together w/out the stroker (the engine guy has another stock crank, pistons and rods for me)?
I'm hung up on the stroker because I like the idea of more displacement (and thus torque/power) at the low end (un-boosted). The only complaint I have about my car is waiting (even if it's a couple of seconds) for the turbo to spool in order to get any power. Does the additional displacement from a stroker make much of a difference? The substitute for the cubic inches is boost at the higher end, right?
Thanks,
Jim