REPLY TO ''BISHIR''...Charger vs. GN...( I 've had both of them...)
I've owned a brand new 1969 Charger R/T with the 440 engine, automatic transmission, and a ''Dana 60'' rear axle with 4.10 gears. Back in '69, we found it was quite fast, but by today's standards, it's still fast but not as much as our memory sometimes makes us think it was. It had great looks, but was not very comfortable, rode like a truck and handled like a truck too. There were some water leaks in the car since day one and neither we or the dealer were able to fix them, probably due to poor body construction or quality control. After installing some headers, a shift kit and a cam the best I was ever able to run with it was a 13.13 et. I have nothing but good memories about that car (which by the way is now fully restored to it's original condition and is in England). But now, times have changed, my GN is waaaay faster than the Charger, and even if I had an opportunity to buy the car back, I wouldn't be interested anymore, now that I've tasted the performance of my GN with a little 231 engine that is much, much faster than that big 440 gas guzzling slug.
Claude.
P.S: ''bishir'', do yourself a favor and get yourself something more recent, that handles better and performs as good ( or faster which is not really difficult to find) as a Charger with a 440 engine and that uses less gas...unless you really, but really have to have one...Like I said, it still looks beautiful with it's coke-bottle shaped body, but unfortunately, it is now a dinosaur by today's standards. ...

I do not want to discourage you, just telling you my opinion about the car and hopefully you can benefit about it...)