TurboJunky
Fire the Federal Gov't
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Messages
- 5,104
How in the HELL can anyone contend GNX "548" is NOT a clone? GM doesn't recognize it, ASC/McLaren doesn't recognize (nor do they either recognize the X-Ray Clone) and neither are in the GNx registry? Are we in Alice in Wonderland?? That'd be like me saying I have a GN because it went down the same assembly line as the rest, was assembled by the same people, using original parts and it came off the line LOOKING like a GN. Funny thing is it's not recognized as a GN by General Motors and WILL NOT be counted as a real GN, in fact it wouldn't even be VIN'd as a GN, no different than someone doing the same thing to a non-GNX like #548. If someone tries to VIN #548 as a bona-fide GNX they're committing fraud on two levels....federal and state. So, if it's not VIN'd as a genuine GNX it's NOT a GNX. I'm sorry but the truth hurts.
I forgot to mention GM wouldn't have made an authentic window sticker for my "theoretical" GN, nor would ASC/McLaren make a genuine window sticker for a supposed GNx #548 either, or X-Ray for that matter. Without authentic VINs and authentic window stickers that positively concludes they're knock-off clones.