You can type here any text you want

boost gauge vs MAP sensor

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

toomanymodz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
1,120
I studied my powerlogger log file carefully and it appears that the boost reading on the powerlogger differs from the pillar-mounted boost gauge by about 2 psi. During my latest 1/4 mile blast, I watched the boost gauge during the last few hundred feet and it was a steady 20 psi, yet the log file read 22 psi.

Is this a common thing? I see that there are some voltage adjustment parameters that are changeable. But a 2 psi variance seems like an awful lot.

Comments?
 
I studied my powerlogger log file carefully and it appears that the boost reading on the powerlogger differs from the pillar-mounted boost gauge by about 2 psi. During my latest 1/4 mile blast, I watched the boost gauge during the last few hundred feet and it was a steady 20 psi, yet the log file read 22 psi.

Is this a common thing? I see that there are some voltage adjustment parameters that are changeable. But a 2 psi variance seems like an awful lot.

Comments?


IMO its not unusual. I see the same on mine. The map sensor is prolly more accurate. I would not be real concerned with it.
 
Same thing happened to me, I thought I was right on 25 psi according to my gauge. Powerlogger showed like 28-29 psi :eek: I've backed it down some since then but haven't driven it to check it out.
 
I'm more inclined to believe the mechanical gauge rather than the MAP sensor. Voltages are a tricky thing on these cars. Just a few milivolts can change the reading.

If I had a 2nd gauge laying around i'd try it.
 
There's no way to really figure out which is accurate unless you have access to a calibrated gauge. As long as you have a good tune and no knock, enjoy what you've got.
 
This is the same conclusion i came up with--I was in the midst of changing locations of a boost gauge in a blown mustang and had two mounted...they both ready very close to the same--the map sensor was 2-3 pounds lower.....

Tune for no knock and be happy

James


There's no way to really figure out which is accurate unless you have access to a calibrated gauge. As long as you have a good tune and no knock, enjoy what you've got.
 
I studied my powerlogger log file carefully and it appears that the boost reading on the powerlogger differs from the pillar-mounted boost gauge by about 2 psi. During my latest 1/4 mile blast, I watched the boost gauge during the last few hundred feet and it was a steady 20 psi, yet the log file read 22 psi.

Is this a common thing? I see that there are some voltage adjustment parameters that are changeable. But a 2 psi variance seems like an awful lot.

Comments?

I saw the same thing on my car. The vacuum reading was quite different. Boost was close but I am only running about 10 pounds right now.

Does the MAP sensor get zero'd out at start-up or when when the Powerlogger connects?
I also noticed the last time I had my a-pillar pod off the nylon tube looked like it might be kinked. I am going to change the tube and see if they match then. You might want to check your tube. Do you guys have better luck with nylon or copper tubes?
 
Back
Top