You can type here any text you want

Car&Driver 05 GT vs. 05 GTO

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Look all i said is that the GTO if it traps 108-110 is in 03 cobra teritory, never said it would beat it, but high 12s no matter the trap will compete with a bone stock cobra, if there are any left out there. Our track is at sealevel and many cobras run in the 108-111 and a few of the well seasoned drivers run 112-113. category. 2 out of 11 cars listed there were the closest to stock and a couple that were bone stock trapped right at 110 which is where i stated was average again proving my point. The rest were modded out. I guess im just one that likes to argue lol, because we are pretty much arguing the same point, but just a small technicality. So ill leave it as that. Have a good one
 
Originally posted by JDSfastGN
Look all i said is that the GTO if it traps 108-110 is in 03 cobra teritory, never said it would beat it, but high 12s no matter the trap will compete with a bone stock cobra, if there are any left out there. Our track is at sealevel and many cobras run in the 108-111 and a few of the well seasoned drivers run 112-113. category. 2 out of 11 cars listed there were the closest to stock and a couple that were bone stock trapped right at 110 which is where i stated was average again proving my point. The rest were modded out. I guess im just one that likes to argue lol, because we are pretty much arguing the same point, but just a small technicality. So ill leave it as that. Have a good one

Same here. My biggest problem is I will argue anything. LOL
Its all good man :D
 
I honestly think that it will be a great matchup between the 05 GTO and the 04 Cobra if they are both stock. I'm sure we will see articles doing comparison tests. They both have a similar price range and power numbers so it should be a good story. I don't believe it was fair to compare the 05 GT to the 05 GTO since they are in different price ranges and hp ratings.
 
Originally posted by Marc87GN
I honestly think that it will be a great matchup between the 05 GTO and the 04 Cobra if they are both stock. I'm sure we will see articles doing comparison tests. They both have a similar price range and power numbers so it should be a good story. I don't believe it was fair to compare the 05 GT to the 05 GTO since they are in different price ranges and hp ratings.

They are about the same size, the GTO is heavier though by almost 200lbs and the GTO has 100 more horses from the get go.
 
Originally posted by GNVAIR
They are about the same size, the GTO is heavier though by almost 200lbs and the GTO has 100 more horses from the get go.

That was what I was getting at. They are several thousands of dollars apart though. I can get into a brand new fully loaded 05 GT for about 25K without an X-plan. I'm sure the GTO with the best rebates will be over 30K.

Low 30s seems to be a tough sports car arena. The Corvettes are bought by older home owners with a good income, the Mustangs, camaros, TAs and sporty imports are affordable for the younger people(18-mid 30s). It doesn't seem like many people are looking to buy a 32K sports car. Usually you can settle for something in the mid 20s that will be fast enough for the average person or buy something in the 40s+ withthe income, house with a garage and another car as a daily driver.

Of course this isn't absolute, but there seems to be a trend of not making too many sports cars that are in that low 30K range.
 
Originally posted by GNVAIR
They are about the same size, the GTO is heavier though by almost 200lbs and the GTO has 100 more horses from the get go.

Mike Tyson and I are about the same size also, but you won't find me in the ring with him. :D
 
I gotta say that with all the different looks available in new cars these days the GTO is pretty bland. Perhaps it will gain some sort of credibility as time goes on, but as of now it just isn't that interesting. The Mustang does have that going for it, even if the look isn't to your taste you most likely will look at it, whereas the GTO probably doesn't really raise a look.
 
I never liked the look of the GTO at all. I finally got to drive one this week and all I can say is wow!. I am sold. The first one to two power shift and I had a huge grin on!! This is a very well balanced performance car that handled well and was comfortable.
I would take one in a heart beat!:D
 
I'll add another wrinkle to this debate.

The '05 Charger is due in summer with a 6.1 425hp hemi and it signifacntly out-torques the LS2.

Now the 300 Hemi C is only a couple tenths off the '04 GTO in the 1/4 and the Charger will be lighter than the 300 for sure.

Start doing the math and I think it will be very interesting. I just hope they throw a 6-speed at the Charger and get the looks right. The designs that have been floated out there in magazines are evidently not what Chrysler is going to build.

If Chrysler was really thinking they would do a Roadruneer version - i.e. no frills, no options. Sell it for under 25K. Light, fast and cheap is always a winning recipe.
 
The 04's seem to be getting faster!

:D 2 stone stock 04 GTO's went 13.1x this weekend in MD.:cool:

I'm trying to get one of them to tell me how many miles he has on the car. LS1's pick up a LOT when broken in.
 
Re: The 04's seem to be getting faster!

Originally posted by NEARING
:D 2 stone stock 04 GTO's went 13.1x this weekend in MD.:cool:

I'm trying to get one of them to tell me how many miles he has on the car. LS1's pick up a LOT when broken in.

I would have to be there to see this on stock rear tires. It might have helped that it was 30-40 degrees there this weekend. GM High Tech magazine was only able to hit 13.30s-40s on M/T tires so I'm having a hard time believing that they were right off the showroom stock. No lid or D/Rs? :confused:
 
Re: Re: The 04's seem to be getting faster!

Originally posted by Marc87GN
I would have to be there to see this on stock rear tires. It might have helped that it was 30-40 degrees there this weekend. GM High Tech magazine was only able to hit 13.30s-40s on M/T tires so I'm having a hard time believing that they were right off the showroom stock. No lid or D/Rs? :confused:

Oh boy.:rolleyes: I'm sure the 40 deg temps and good track prep they said they had did help. And Cecil is a fast track.

LS2 GTO.com

Feel free to go raise the BS flag on them.;)
 
Wow...not bad. I never figured the '04 GTO's to go that quick.
I still haven't had one bite against the Cobra. :D
posted by JDSfastGN
In fact I have a friend that went 12.4 at 112.4 in a bone stock 03 cobra so there is no arguing they are quick. But AVERAGE mph is 108-111 or so. Sorry but they do not bone stock with out any changes run 115 or even 114. There may be a few freaks that made 114 on a really cold night or something but it is by no means the average or even close. They are capable of mid 12s off the show room, but they typically run 12.8-13.2 at 108-111 bone stock. Make a few small changes like a cold air kit and x/h pipe and 115 becomes doable but not until then. I don't really see where i was incorrect at all?
I think you and Lee are both on the same page, but may have different experiences regarding what you've actually seen at the track.
Here are the facts on my car, since it was discussed at length (and my ears weren't even burning ;) ).
Bone stock, the car made 364rwrhp/353rwtq at about 1100 miles. Silencer was pulled off the car, yielding a loss of 1rwhp.
Second trip to the track (Atco), on June 4th '04, it went 12.6.
Breakdown is as follows:

60' 1.956
330' 5.408
1/8 8.229
mph 87.74
990' 10.568
1/4 12.665
mph 111.83
Temp at the track, as Lee can attest, was in the upper-60's/low-70's, humidity ~50%, baro in the low 29.xx" (as listed on the previous run's slip from 45 minutes earlier...not weather data on the 12.6 slip). Ran a couple other 12.8's that night on worse short times and similar mph.
Went 12.7@111mph a week later in absolutely crummy air. 71*, 94% humidity and 29.15" barometer.
DA on the 12.6 was probably around 1600', on the 12.7 it was probably ~2000" or so.
Ran a few more 12.8's over the next month or so, fighting traction problems and crappy air.
November 10th I ran again. It was in the low-40's, very dry. A friend there with his 11.3 LS1 F-body said the baro was over 30.0". First pass I wheelhopped badly. At this point, the car had ~16k miles on it (19.8k on it as of today), and the stock F1's were worn. First pass was a miserable 14.3@109mph wheelhopping through 1st and 2nd.
I hotlapped the car and switched lanes. Car was still semi-cool from sitting in the pits waiting for the lanes to open for 90 minutes.
I launched the car easier, no wheelspin and thus, no wheelhop.

60' 2.304
330' 5.814
1/8 8.567
mph 90.31
990' 10.848
1/4 12.885
mph 115.13
No mods, stock F1's. I pedaled the car hard in 1st, grannied 2nd and didn't go WOT till midway through that gear.
I let the car cool, made another crack and blew off the tires in 2nd gear on the way to a 13.00@112mph.
I hotlapped and was lined up against who I believe was Herb Fishman (from this board) in his GNX.
I left harder, caught a harder 1-2...and freaking missed 4th gear with the damn stock shifter.
60' 2.255
330' 5.704
1/8 8.448
mph 90.36
990' 10.880
1/4 13.493
mph 85.01
You'll note the 1/8 mile times and 90mph 1/8th.

At this point, I realized it was a futile effort. Traction was nonexistent for me, and I wasn't going to hook the car. I ran another 12.8 at 113mph and a tirespinning 13.0@113mph.
I'm done shooting for ET in a stock car. I have to replace the factory F1's, and I'm not using the same tires...by that definition, the car is no longer stock anyway. I put in a CAI and Steeda Tri-Ax. I also have a set of MT ET Street Radials (275/40-17's) on a set of stock Cobra wheels. I'd like to get low-12's on a CAI and DR's, but I also have a few mods to go on the car (ported blower/TB/plenum, pulley/idler).
12.4@112.4 is flyin'!
S.
 
Re: Re: Re: The 04's seem to be getting faster!

Originally posted by NEARING
Oh boy.:rolleyes: I'm sure the 40 deg temps and good track prep they said they had did help. And Cecil is a fast track.

LS2 GTO.com

Feel free to go raise the BS flag on them.;)

I'm sure the car was quick because it is a fast track. I went there for the first Modular Mustang event and ran 11s, but the track temps were well over 100 degrees. I'm sure in 40 degree weather on that track, a well driven Cobra would hit low/mid 12s @ 113+. Cars with forced induction love cold air. My GN is spinning the tires well into 2nd gear easily right now at 16-18 psi.

Wait until my Stage 3 heads come back from VPE. I won't even be worried about a stock GTO. If one ever beats me, the next size turbo that goes on will be a big shaft. I have my eye on a TA-64 so we will see what happens by the summer. :D
 
Cecil is a very fast track...in my opinion faster than Atco or E-town. For some reason, and by some anomaly, Saturday morning T&T's always gave me the best times. It's that "magical" Cecil air.

Get VPE to port an intake and match it to those heads.
S.
 
Originally posted by Snorman
Cecil is a very fast track...in my opinion faster than Atco or E-town. For some reason, and by some anomaly, Saturday morning T&T's always gave me the best times. It's that "magical" Cecil air.

Get VPE to port an intake and match it to those heads.
S.

Will do. It's an extra $150 I believe, but worth it I'm sure. With heads flowing over 60 cfm better than stock, it must make a very big difference in power at the same boost level.

I installed a MPE intercooler with 3" neck and the boost bangs 18 psi in a fraction of a second destroying the tires in 1st and 2nd. I plan to be quite ready for the new GTO when it arrives. It's only $$$. :D
 
Tony did a nice job on my intake. Cut and welded the EGR and port matched it to the heads. Worth the $$$ on the front end.
S.
 
Originally posted by Snorman
Wow...not bad. I never figured the '04 GTO's to go that quick.
I still haven't had one bite against the Cobra. :D
I think you and Lee are both on the same page, but may have different experiences regarding what you've actually seen at the track.
Here are the facts on my car, since it was discussed at length (and my ears weren't even burning ;) ).
Bone stock, the car made 364rwrhp/353rwtq at about 1100 miles. Silencer was pulled off the car, yielding a loss of 1rwhp.
Second trip to the track (Atco), on June 4th '04, it went 12.6.
Breakdown is as follows:

60' 1.956
330' 5.408
1/8 8.229
mph 87.74
990' 10.568
1/4 12.665
mph 111.83
Temp at the track, as Lee can attest, was in the upper-60's/low-70's, humidity ~50%, baro in the low 29.xx" (as listed on the previous run's slip from 45 minutes earlier...not weather data on the 12.6 slip). Ran a couple other 12.8's that night on worse short times and similar mph.
Went 12.7@111mph a week later in absolutely crummy air. 71*, 94% humidity and 29.15" barometer.
DA on the 12.6 was probably around 1600', on the 12.7 it was probably ~2000" or so.
Ran a few more 12.8's over the next month or so, fighting traction problems and crappy air.
November 10th I ran again. It was in the low-40's, very dry. A friend there with his 11.3 LS1 F-body said the baro was over 30.0". First pass I wheelhopped badly. At this point, the car had ~16k miles on it (19.8k on it as of today), and the stock F1's were worn. First pass was a miserable 14.3@109mph wheelhopping through 1st and 2nd.
I hotlapped the car and switched lanes. Car was still semi-cool from sitting in the pits waiting for the lanes to open for 90 minutes.
I launched the car easier, no wheelspin and thus, no wheelhop.

60' 2.304
330' 5.814
1/8 8.567
mph 90.31
990' 10.848
1/4 12.885
mph 115.13
No mods, stock F1's. I pedaled the car hard in 1st, grannied 2nd and didn't go WOT till midway through that gear.
I let the car cool, made another crack and blew off the tires in 2nd gear on the way to a 13.00@112mph.
I hotlapped and was lined up against who I believe was Herb Fishman (from this board) in his GNX.
I left harder, caught a harder 1-2...and freaking missed 4th gear with the damn stock shifter.
60' 2.255
330' 5.704
1/8 8.448
mph 90.36
990' 10.880
1/4 13.493
mph 85.01
You'll note the 1/8 mile times and 90mph 1/8th.

At this point, I realized it was a futile effort. Traction was nonexistent for me, and I wasn't going to hook the car. I ran another 12.8 at 113mph and a tirespinning 13.0@113mph.
I'm done shooting for ET in a stock car. I have to replace the factory F1's, and I'm not using the same tires...by that definition, the car is no longer stock anyway. I put in a CAI and Steeda Tri-Ax. I also have a set of MT ET Street Radials (275/40-17's) on a set of stock Cobra wheels. I'd like to get low-12's on a CAI and DR's, but I also have a few mods to go on the car (ported blower/TB/plenum, pulley/idler).
12.4@112.4 is flyin'!
S.

Yeah Lee and I were pretty much arguing to argue lol. Your car runs really well for stock, epsecially the 115 trap. Last night i was at the track with my sister in her car (00 auto Z28) and saw my friend mentioned earlier with the 12.4 at 112, and the next week after the runs i mentioned he did get a 114mph trap on a slower ET, so it seems more possible than I had thought. Goodluck on the 03 man, is that ported blower an Apten? It should really fly.
And about the GTO goin low 13s it seems pretty believable, they are heavier than an fbody but should make a little more power (should bein the key word). My sisters bone stock 00 Z28 wtih 3.23s went 13.19 at 104.8 last night so they seem pretty believable since they probably had good air and a few more miles on em.
 
Back
Top