We4ever
Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2019
- Messages
- 71
I consider it a down-market luxury GT 2+2. Like an american version of a big jaguar coupe or similar.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!
Not just a muscle car... The undisputed king of muscle cars?
Right, I have it linked to my FB page.That video never gets old. lol
Was having a conversation with a buddy the other night and we were going over Turbobuick’s. His opinion is the muscle car era ended in 1972 when they went to low compression engines. But I think the Turbobuick is a muscle car maybe the last. His opinion a Turbobuick is just a 80s performance car and a v6 is not a muscle motor turbo or not. Do you guys consider a Turbobuick a muscle car if not what do you categorize it as being.
ohh my sounds like racing words indeeda v6 is not a muscle motor turbo or not.
Maybe Jim Wangers and John Deloren will check in and give their thoughts since they invented the "muscle car"
BING BING BING.......we have a winner!Mustangs,Cougars,Cudas,Dusters,Challengers,Javelins,Firebirds,and Camaros are Pony Cars. Corvettes are super cars. Midsized Sedans with big power are and always have been and always will be Muscle Cars. The last muscle cars made in America were the 1984-1987 Buick turbo Regals. There were many cars made in America that weren't midsized sedans and were and are very muscular. They're just not Mascle Cars.
I use to have much respect for Jim Wangers until I saw an interview with him crying and bitching about how Buick never should have been allowed to develop the Turbo Buick. What an asshole. Him and his bad wig REALLY made an ass of themselves.......
Maybe he just forgot to take his ex-lax dosage that day.
I guess that settles the OP question............
Yeah, Wangers comes off as a jerk saying that. Of course this is the guy that sent out a 421 ringer 64 GTO for the press. Nice wig.