It's the multi disks that rattle. Precision uses a number system to designate how slippery they are. I have a zero pump that I believe is advertised as a 3,000 to 3,200 stall speed which I think is silly because it will go much higher than that as the boost and power climb. I can easily see 4,500 rpm before I release the trans break.
The problem that I see when people talk about this verses that is that the goals/use of their car isn't clearly defied. Because of this you have one person in the conversation who has the goal of setting a new world record on his mind. He hasn't been told,nor has he asked,about the goals of the person who asked the question so they might not be on the same page.
You and I and many others will not go the NL way because we like to drive our cars on the street most of the time. For us,the only choice is single disk or multi disk. I don't know if I would go LU if my car was race only. Many don't. Red Armstrong runs high 8s at 150 mph and still uses a Vig Multi.
I've compared Powerlogger files of cars similar to mine and noted that their rpm was much lower than mine at any given mph once they were past first gear. First gear was very similar. I also noted that they never got past 5,200 rpm with motors that made max power at 5,800 rpm. Again,my motor would be revving much higher at any given mph,but my motor spent more time in the max power area and gained mph faster.
Yes, it slips a lot as the power goes up when it's unlocked. Not when it's locked. They both have pros and cons. They accomplish things in different ways. It's not a right or wrong thing. It's a choice. It's too bad that you got a single disk.
I went though a lot of LU convertors before I got the PTC NL; Art Carr, 2 9x11's, a 7 disc Vigilante and 2 from CK performance. The PTC has great street manners and the difference in highway driving is not noticeable at 50 RPM difference at 70 -75 MPH.