By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!What is it about the datalog that makes you think that?tough to see the need for direct port when you see a log like pauls
I remember the 03-04 Cobra intake with the 4 nozzles. It has a much better intake design, but it is almost 20 years newer. I think all of this was discussed in the "dual fed fuel rail" thread a few months ago.Didn't Julio show a Mustang he was working on that had injection into each port in the manifold?
What is it about the datalog that makes you think that?
Didn't Julio show a Mustang he was working on that had injection into each port in the manifold?
what about putting the nozzle further from the throttle body? like somthing over 1.5 feet out from the throttle? or in the case of a stock location ic, put it deep in to the end tank outlet...give it more time to atomize
Sounds like one of my old plenum spacers would be the ticket for stopping that. I havent seen one in years since Kirban stopped selling them, tho.
Is that O2 reading and 2% correction for just #1 cylinder? Or, is the correction based on an O2 reading involving a mix of the exhaust from all the cylinders, which might dilute what is actually happening with #1 cylinder?don,2% correction at temp below 70 degrees as discussed in this thread with no knock and no direct port on a 10 teen run.
Its best to shut off the correction in those areas because there are other tables that will dump fuel based on map rise rate, and tps rise rate. Usually the time in sec during that transition is small anyway.Another thing I'm not too keen about with the datalog is the O2 correction oscillation which is also setting up an oscillation of the a/f ratio during a critical point in the rpm ramp up rate. You can even see where the oscillation causes a problem in the rpm ramp up curve. The O2 correction needs some fine tuning.
I completely agree.The correction is based off all cylinders don. Which doesn't really tell you where you are on #1. His charge air temp is high enough so I'd consider it fairly safe where he is. It was probably 75* the day he made that pass. Egt on each cyl will tell the tale. Eliminating the intercooler could prove worthwhile on an application where vaporizing (not atomizing) is important. The alky has to vaporize for proper distribution. Atomized is still a liquid and is seperate from the air.
Again, I agree. This is a very good example of why I don't use O2 correction at all. Ever.Its best to shut off the correction in those areas because there are other tables that will dump fuel based on map rise rate, and tps rise rate. Usually the time in sec during that transition is small anyway.