Champion or TA heads best flow #s

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Originally posted by TurboDave
That's where the SII heads come into play. If you need the big flow numbers, they'll get you there and then some.
It would be quite difficult getting large enough ports/runners built into a stock sized head and try and get the flow numbers of the SII heads. That's why the SII heads are so tall/large, to accomodate the huge ports/valves/runners needed to flow in the 300's

Absolutely.A pair of stage 2 heads can be bought for way less than a pair of GN1s anyways.Why would anyone really try to compete with that?

The only problem with going to stage 2 heads is finding a decent intake setup and the difference in the cam,and rockers.More expense on top.
 
No flame, just bad info...

Originally posted by DR.BOOSTER
I am not trying to flame here but

1) How come the new heads were not designed to flow into the 300 + cfm arena? Why not do a new ground up head design with a special intake mani that flow some impressive numbers? I find it odd that there was a bad ass block made from scratch to run 8's and 9's for $4k and then a set of heads that sort of follow the heard and flow 260 ported.

.......I would pay $3k for a set of GN heads and custom intake that flow over 300cfm out of the box, and 4K if it would go 330+ ported. ............................

I reason I hesistated to post flow numbers is because of mis-information like this.:(

First of all, tell me your experience in 7, 8, 9 and 10 sec. turbo Buick motors and builds? If you had some, you would NOT have posted what you did. Guess you do not know a 280 cfm flow on an alum head will take you into the 8's with the proper build?

Ever hear of TSO class cars running 8's with Champion heads? Or how about a TA motor [with TA heads] developing 1180 HP?

Then to compare a Pontiac head/flow with a turbo Buick illustrates you missed the TURBO part.:confused: Go with your Pontiac and carb, then get your butt handed to you by a turbo Buick with heads flowing half of them.:)

Bigger flow numbers, Dave said it real well. That is why Ruggles and Buick Motorsports went to Stage heads, to get the flow [HP] needed to compete with a carb on the round track.

Let's go back to TSO class to help verify my info. The fast cars in this class run mid-8's. Some have aftermarket heads, some use Stage heads. The limiting factor is the 88 mid-frame turbo, NOT the heads. Super 16 cars, with Stage heads and massive or twin turbos, run into the 7's. We have done stage heads that do flow 330 cfm, but most racers cannot afford to take advantage of this to provide the expenses build, maintain and campaign such a beast.

To validate our data further, we have flowed heads from Dutweiller and Champion and have compared the results from each. Our results are within 1% of their results. Unless there is a good basis for comparison, flow numbers mean nothing but sales propaganda.

When we do an engine build, we find out the customer's goals for power, use and budget. It is from here that we select or recommend parts like heads, cam etc. We do not start with head flow numbers and build from them.:)
 
In other words you are better off with ported irons on a street car?

If we are talking bang for the buck, and big flow numbers are not what they seem? No benefits to the aluminum heads?

Tom
 
The benefit to the aluminum heads are that they still flow better than ported irons,are lighter,can run slightly more boost without knock.

Ported irons have been in the 9s,although not as much as cars with aluminums.
 
Like I said, just wondering. I think the new heads are great and have probably maxed out the cfm potential of the stock 109 head design.

The info I stated was exactly what you said, 260cfm=$2.5-3k.

No, I do not have a 7-8 or 9 second GN, but which one of those guys would rather use a head that flowed 260 over 360 or 460cfm? Big Heads = Big Power.

T88 at 30 psi through 300 cfm heads is not making the same power as through 400 cfm heads.

Very few big cfm options out there for the 109 block is the point. I was just hoping that TA would of kicked it up a bunch since they were making the cookies from scratch.

I know about the stage 2 heads, but what about the other 6 open holes:eek: As far as I know, no one has slapped a set on a 109, right???

My point on the Pontiyacks is that the stock heads flow 240, the aftermarket heard the cries and is now up to 490 fully ported!!

HP for NA High Performance Motors
0.25714 x cfm x number of cylinders
240 cfm head on 8 cylinders = 494 hp
490 cfm head on 8 cylinders = 1008 hp

Not much butt handing going to happen there anymore;)

If I am coming across negative in any way I appologize:)
 
Originally posted by DR.BOOSTER


<snip>


My point on the Pontiyacks is that the stock heads flow 240, the aftermarket heard the cries and is now up to 490 fully ported!!

<snip>


The problem is: How many Pontiacs out there? How many Turbo Buicks out there?
The run of the mill aftermarket is never going to spend the time and money on a small niche market like us. It's just the unforturnate facts of life.
It's going to take and inovator like T/A to keep us alive and well, and because our numbers are so small, the parts are NEVER going to be cheap.
 
Nick, is it true that the T/A heads are not a new, ground up design? Heard a few years back that the T/A's were an improvement/redesign of the M&A heads. Thanks Brian
 
bumping an old one

After reading this old thread i wonder if any of these guys have a different outlook on head flow. I wonder if they relalize you could have put a stage 2 head on a stock block? Lol! Things have come much further than they were in 2004:biggrin:
 
Interesting thread then, still debated today.
All comes down to the combo, tune, time and a little CASH!
8's with irons, 8's with 67mm turbo, and low nines on a stock ecm and chip. All using a stock block.
 
Back
Top