Not to sound like an @$$ or anything, but I think the statement is unfair.
Let me explain my thoughts on this.
I have NOT yet replaced this resistor wire and have not noticed any "break-up or misfire" issues up to 24 PSI with plugs gapped at 0.032".
It is however very possible that the previous owner already removed the wire.
Having said that .........
"If" the resistor is in fact in place, it will reduce the voltage feed to the coil.
I notice consistently about a 0.5-0.7 drop in ECM voltage during runs, which must be the result of the required load.
Some may say that it is a charging issue, but I will tell you that the charging system is in tip-top shape, as are the grounds.
I can only guess that the voltage drop under load would lower supplied voltage to the ignition coil.
A drop in supply voltage of 1.0V makes a huge difference in output voltage! (Call it 3.5KV drop at the plug between friends :tongue: )
So, it DOES make sense to remove the resistance and get the full battery voltage to the coils.
With the added output voltage, I may be able to open the plug gap to 0.034 for a 24 PSI run.
Now, at 15 PSI boost, the Butt Dyno may never know the difference between 12.8V and 13.8V to the coil.
At 24 PSI, the Butt Dyno may still not know the difference, but I bet the engine will, as will the knock gage and the time slip.
Comparison testing on a dyno and/or track may be the best way to find out.
To me, it makes a LOT of sense and performance increase can be explained.
Besides, John Spina knows what he is talking about and if he recommends it, it is good enough for me.
Now back to regular programming. :biggrin: