Originally posted by Ormand
In the wrong place for what? A Speed denisty system, sure, but to use the IAT for a MAF sensor trim like the stock system does? In that case it seems to makes sense to have it near the MAF sensor then, no?
The stock MAF and MAT combination works well where it is. If the MAF is moved to a location downstream of the turbo, the pressure variations will result in density variations WAY beyond the design range of the instrument. Moving the MAT with it would seem logical, but would still not work, because of the limited range. The density variation with temperature is MUCH less than that which would result from pressure changes of 20 psi. I have no idea what the design range of the Chevy MAF is, but I would be surprised if it is designed for a density variation of 2 or 3 to one.
Moving the MAF, in theory, will help throttle response, but since there is only one MAF, and six cylinders, it is still an "average" flow. If you're going to reduce duty cycle, by the way, why not go below 50%? Then the injector will only function during the intake stroke?
The "buzzing" from static injectors is simple. Think about it. Just before static, the "dwell time" is not enough for the injectors to fully open/close. Instead, they will cycle from almost open to open, back to almost open, they never really close. Sounds funny, don't know if it hurts the injector though.
PCV was introduced to cut down on smog. Old cars with blowby have a cloud that follows them, unburned hydrocarbons blown through and out fthe crankcase. The PCV routes this junk back into the engine, where it might burn. (or maybe not) First attempt was just to route crankcase vent back to the air cleaner- boy what a mess! The PCV valve routed it directly to the intake manifold, where it wasn't as obvious of a mess.