Silver Fox
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2003
- Messages
- 1,150
...I never get typical results on anything I do to this car so I'm used to it...
Amen brother. I am glad I am not the only one.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!...I never get typical results on anything I do to this car so I'm used to it...
Alright guys I need some opinions on what went wrong for me. 5658 in front got me a nice 28.5-29" ride height (depending on which part of the cracked garage floor I measure from). 3.5" gap between tire and fender.
Is it not seated right? I made sure I put the bottom of the spring in the exact same position as the stock one when I pulled it out, but couldn't really get a good look at the top perch and was just hoping it would go in as long as I had the bottom lined up right.
Opinions?
Mine looked like a four wheel drive right after I left it down from the jackstands. I went out in a parking lot and hit the brakes hard three times and it settled down.
Did you ever get any pictures of your car with the spacers in?
Mine looked like a four wheel drive right after I left it down from the jackstands. I went out in a parking lot and hit the brakes hard three times and it settled down.
Mine definitely wasn't on the top perch correctly. Tried bouncing it but it was stuck. I repositioned it and just have to bolt everything back up, aka line up the control arm again.
Mine definitely wasn't on the top perch correctly. Tried bouncing it but it was stuck. I repositioned it and just have to bolt everything back up, aka line up the control arm again.
Here is a picture of my car with the Moog 5658's. Ride Height was 25.125 inches. I had some tire/fender rubbing when I hit bumps/dips in the orad
Here are a few pictures of my car with the Moog 5658's and SPC .5 inch spacers which give one inch of lift. Ride height is now 26 inches. No rubbing now.
I was lazy and left the car in the garage. Next time I drive it I will get some better pictures outside.
Looks good! How much total drop did you end up with from the beginning to start? Another nice thing is if you want to change it down the raod, you have that adjustability!
Yeah i would agree that the 5413 look as though it will lower the car just by comparing height of springs. I have read that people definately like them for cornering purposes. I wonder how much a new stock replacement spring sits versus the 5413? My used stock springs in my 86K mile car sat about an inch lower than the 21K mile car. This may be a difference as well. I think we should have someone measure their low mile original car and see where the comparison is. I read on a few different places where people installed the 5658 springs in the fron and it acutally raised the car becuase their stock springs were sagged that badly. What size tire are you running in the rear?
OK I just went out and measured my 57K mile Limited that has stock tires on it. It measures 27 7/8 floor to bottom of lip. The 215/65R15 tire diameter is 26".
Jeremy,
It sat at 27 inches with the Simmons/245/45/17s and stock springs/UCAs.
I am going to drop down to a 235/45, and if they tuck in nice I may swap out the .5 inch spacer for a 3/8 one (which would give 3/4 inch lift). I should have about a 25 and 3/4 inch ride height in that case.
Rob
Rob, I know your front ride height is 26" now. Just curious, what is the back? Looks like maybe 27"? I'm trying to dial my car in so the back is 1/4" to 1/2" higher than the front. That should give me just a very slight rake.
Rob, I know your front ride height is 26" now. Just curious, what is the back? Looks like maybe 27"? I'm trying to dial my car in so the back is 1/4" to 1/2" higher than the front. That should give me just a very slight rake.