GNBRETT
Pelennor Fields
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
Neither you or I have established our expertise so I will just ask again and include all the stuff you keep ignoring...My googleing simply provided mfr specs that shows somebody here is wrong about some things. I would not expect the fine TB.C members to just take my word for it because I typed it and posted it on the message board...like you did.
How do you know? This is the second [make that thrid] time I asked you this - why do you not answer?
Perhaps you do not answer for the same reason you chose to ignore challenges I made in my last post calling you on the accusations and conclusions YOU MADE.
Now are you gonna take responsibility for those comments YOU MADE or will you keep digging?
Here it is again:
I am sorry that google enabled me to so quickly supply information from the manufacturer that confirms what I have already said, and I never said K is more sensitive then Ka so no embarrassment there - well at least on my part.
So show us where I confused LIDAR with Radar since you also accused me of some failure there. And while you are at it, please do tell how you know so much about my certifications, or lack there of.
The "copy and paste from the Internet" defense is only good when you do not have anything substantial to say; although the National Radar Defense thing in a speed gun thread was kinda funny. However, when one chooses such a defense it would be better directed at a copy and pasted blog, not specifications from the mfr. Or are we to understand that you know more about the laser and radar guns the engineers that design and build these things?
Let me try again. I speak from personal experience while experimenting on the highway. That's how I know. Can you say that? I didn't think so.