An incomplete analogy ... Do you suppose the homeowner escapes late charges by virtue of having dropped his mortgage payment into the mail box, and his "responsibility ends there" ?Tom, let's put it simply: your mortgage bill is lost/stolen in the mail, and you get assessed a late charge- is it right?
Yes, because the mortgage wasn't paid on time. The mortgage company put the bill in good faith that it would be delivered. Their responsibility ends there. ...
Should the homeowner tell the bank "Well, I put my payment into the mailbox, I have no further responsibility. Mr. Banker, you take it up with the postal service". Fat chance. Unless and until the bank receives actual possession of the payment, homeowner will pay late charges.
This happened to me once, and now my payments go out "signature required/ return receipt".
Concerning the throttle body, if buyer and seller had agreed upfront that no insurance would be purchased and that buyer assumes all risk, then "responsibility" would have been clearly on the buyer.
But that's not what happened, based on what people have been posting.
In post #18, seller writes "I offer a service. It's up to the customer to provide instructions for both the work done and the shipping instructions."
You sure wouldn't know this from his website, where there is barely any mention of shipping policies, and very specific performance claims are also made.
I still think both parties bear some responsibility, and it's not "buyer is 100% wrong and seller is 100% right" ...
Somewhere above I think buyer and seller did finally reach some kind of compromise (?)... the last 20-ish posts have had nothing to with the actual, eventual outcome. At this point, so many of our positions have gotten "dug in" and the rhetoric so heated, that I doubt anyone's going to change their opinions.