Just PM'd you on the converter.Btw guys.. the 200 that's in this car is for sale. $1200. & PTC converter too $600.
Posted from the TurboBuick.Com mobile app
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Just PM'd you on the converter.Btw guys.. the 200 that's in this car is for sale. $1200. & PTC converter too $600.
Posted from the TurboBuick.Com mobile app
WOW 43 PSI unheard of for a 109 im afraid to push mine to 30
i disagree with this. The engine is what will determine the potential mass flow in that example and it shouldn't need a lot of octane to make 700hp either. The turbo doesn't dictate octane requirementsA Stage II car at 17psi from a 4788 needs more octane and a better tune than a stock 109 @ 30+psi from a TE44.
i disagree with this. The engine is what will determine the potential mass flow in that example and it shouldn't need a lot of octane to make 700hp either. The turbo doesn't dictate octane requirements
No. You can't really fill the cylinder more than 100% in either situation. The stage 2 with big cam and much higher runner volume and larger valves will have a much higher rpm potential and will likely have a much lower mass efficiency below 5500 rpm than the stock engine. Cylinder pressure and heat will determine octane requirements for the most part . If you increase engine speed 2000 rpm and are filling the cylinder with clean charge air you have increased mass flow a boat load over the low rpm high boost engine. It's not even close. You likely be running into back pressure with the te44 on the stock engine and that reduces te mass efficiency a lot and raises octane requirement even more.