1NASTYGN
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2009
- Messages
- 421
6766cea worked great with my combo spooled great and pulled hard at 18lbs. I believe it spoiled faster than my turbonetics 70ptq.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!9.5" n/l 18/19 would work well ...the 10" 3200 will put a limit on your performance.200R4 w a PTC 3200 be ok?
And that's the truth!you guys should take a ride in what you think you want,one guys super fast turbo is another guys slug
Ptc 18? Would that work well with the 6265 or 6466?Anyone looking for a new 18 blade I have one on the shelf. 3-4 week lead on these if ordered today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ptc 18? Would that work well with the 6265 or 6466?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Depending on how hard you are running it and what hot side you are running. The harder you run the tighter the converter needs to be.Ptc 18? Would that work well with the 6265 or 6466?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Probably going with 6265 w/.63 hotside. (Whatever you have for a housing).Depending on how hard you are running it and what hot side you are running. The harder you run the tighter the converter needs to be.
If you look at the latest logs of mine you will see that even the 17 blade may be too loose. Flash at 5550 at 33-35psi. 9.40ish power. The power starts dropping at 5800 on mine. Car would need proper gearing and tighter converter to run the number. By 6000 it's really out of steam compared to lower 5000's. With a tangential 4 bolt or v band housing that better accommodates the turbine the observed drop off at 5800 would likely be a few hundred rpm higher. May need a little more spring also but don't really care to push the stock shortblock that hard.Probably going with 6265 w/.63 hotside. (Whatever you have for a housing).
17 or 18 blade?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk