Since you just use it for spool, I like the idea of making the pinwheel the sole nitrous system, with no need to switch to another. And if it works well, you could likely also reduce the size of the nitrous hit.
What I also really like about the idea is, it seems you also greatly reduce the charge cooling effect from expanding the nitrous. Which is one of the main things you were trying to accomplish- quit cooling down the charge so much. Now that cooling effect goes into cooling down a big part of the entry section aluminum of your intercooler. Which seems would also help pre-run cool much of its aluminum for a bit better performace down the track, under boost.
But the charge air coming out of the intercooler then would likely be much more moderate, compared to spraying directly into the intake air stream. Hosing upstream for ~ 3 sec only would probably never chill down the big ol' intercooler chunk of aluminum enough to greatly reduce the IAT from spraying.
3 birds with one stone maybe
Some diesel/nat gas engine projects I was involved with did in fact use the pinwheel spool technique, where the compressed air was supplied via the on board compressed air system (for the brakes). It does work. As a thrill back in the day (lol), I got to bench test one with a hand air valve connected to the shop air supply. It would spin up to near 20 thousand rpm in just a few sec if I recall (we had a tach on it too). Of course this was into no compressor load. The holes and such do not require too much engineering to get close. Intuition and careful thought can get you close enough.
Maybe to get a feel for it you could find an old dead stock turbo and experiment with like 1 hole to begin with, and just connect up your shop air tank. Or better than drilling several test holes, maybe you could mill out an acces slot in the housing, then just aim by hand (or with a jig) a thin piece of home made tubing nozzle (simulates a drill hole) at various angles and places until you find the sweet spot. Sounds like fun for a Friday afternoon.
If it winds up working well, I think you might then see an influx of compressor housings at DRW to drill for others Alot of imports probably, but still. And maybe some ruidmentary plumbing of it too- for a reasonable shop fee of course
TurboTR
Edit- just thinking out loud some more about the holes. Seems a great tactic would be to have like 3-4 of them, but NOT equally spaced. Offset the relative spacing such that at least one nozzle hole is always engaged with a compressor blade. As the wheel spins around. As soon as hole 1 pushes its blade away enough to be ~ ineffective (until its next blade comes around), hole 2 has engaged its blade now. Etc.
The one I tested did not have this offset spacing. If I recall it had like 6 holes, but all equally spaced. I bet it would have worked even better still with a clever offset scheme...
Edit 2- Seems you could experiment with that offset spacing idea using the milled access slot just by positioning 2 nozzles. Offset spacing work better than equal spacing (relative to the blade pitch)? Seems that would be easy enough to determine then.
What I also really like about the idea is, it seems you also greatly reduce the charge cooling effect from expanding the nitrous. Which is one of the main things you were trying to accomplish- quit cooling down the charge so much. Now that cooling effect goes into cooling down a big part of the entry section aluminum of your intercooler. Which seems would also help pre-run cool much of its aluminum for a bit better performace down the track, under boost.
But the charge air coming out of the intercooler then would likely be much more moderate, compared to spraying directly into the intake air stream. Hosing upstream for ~ 3 sec only would probably never chill down the big ol' intercooler chunk of aluminum enough to greatly reduce the IAT from spraying.
3 birds with one stone maybe
Some diesel/nat gas engine projects I was involved with did in fact use the pinwheel spool technique, where the compressed air was supplied via the on board compressed air system (for the brakes). It does work. As a thrill back in the day (lol), I got to bench test one with a hand air valve connected to the shop air supply. It would spin up to near 20 thousand rpm in just a few sec if I recall (we had a tach on it too). Of course this was into no compressor load. The holes and such do not require too much engineering to get close. Intuition and careful thought can get you close enough.
Maybe to get a feel for it you could find an old dead stock turbo and experiment with like 1 hole to begin with, and just connect up your shop air tank. Or better than drilling several test holes, maybe you could mill out an acces slot in the housing, then just aim by hand (or with a jig) a thin piece of home made tubing nozzle (simulates a drill hole) at various angles and places until you find the sweet spot. Sounds like fun for a Friday afternoon.
If it winds up working well, I think you might then see an influx of compressor housings at DRW to drill for others Alot of imports probably, but still. And maybe some ruidmentary plumbing of it too- for a reasonable shop fee of course
TurboTR
Edit- just thinking out loud some more about the holes. Seems a great tactic would be to have like 3-4 of them, but NOT equally spaced. Offset the relative spacing such that at least one nozzle hole is always engaged with a compressor blade. As the wheel spins around. As soon as hole 1 pushes its blade away enough to be ~ ineffective (until its next blade comes around), hole 2 has engaged its blade now. Etc.
The one I tested did not have this offset spacing. If I recall it had like 6 holes, but all equally spaced. I bet it would have worked even better still with a clever offset scheme...
Edit 2- Seems you could experiment with that offset spacing idea using the milled access slot just by positioning 2 nozzles. Offset spacing work better than equal spacing (relative to the blade pitch)? Seems that would be easy enough to determine then.