Who else but me. I wish i could have ran the one in the blue car that you dynoed before the teardown. That thing would have laid down 130+mph easily. It had a lot more nut than this one. Itll be back with race ported GN1 heads and intake, 4 bolted, and a monster fuel system to feed it. We will dyno that one too see what it can put down:biggrin: . We will discuss converter and turbo for it in the near future. Its going to fly. Not like your LSX but you know what i mean.
Guess what i ran et/mph
- Thread starter bison
- Start date
Welcome!
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Who else but me. I wish i could have ran the one in the blue car that you dynoed before the teardown. That thing would have laid down 130+mph easily. It had a lot more nut than this one. Itll be back with race ported GN1 heads and intake, 4 bolted, and a monster fuel system to feed it. We will dyno that one too see what it can put down:biggrin: . We will discuss converter and turbo for it in the near future. Its going to fly. Not like your LSX but you know what i mean.
vacuum 6
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2006
- Messages
- 2,410
Yeah but how did you tune it meaning what equipment are you using? WB...what?
Also what tire are you running?
LM1 wideband and TT chip. Took about 15 minutes and 3 or 4 passes in 3rd turning up the boost and watching the a/f's. I wound up about 5% under the baseline with the DIY alky. I pulled an extra 5% out of first. I ran a pair 28x10 Goodyear slicks that are 5 years old. Tires werent critical since i launched lightly. I would have liked to have had a set of M/T dr's.
vacuum 6
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2006
- Messages
- 2,410
In 3rd gear when the a/fs were good how did it compare to the 02s?
I didnt look at the factory location narrow band O2's while running the 10.88 but on the street they equate to roughly .740-.750 millivolts in 3rd at 11.4:1 under the same conditions. Sensor to sensor variation, type of exhaust manifold, and location of the sensor will all have an effect on the output voltage at WOT. This is why i stress getting a wideband datalogger like an LM1. The powerlogger shows very promising results and can be run in series with the scanmaster to get faster more accurate feedback but is mainly limited to a TR setup for it. I love my LM1 though. It is easily transferred to another vehicle and there is a bracket available that connects to the tailpipe for tuning old carbureted dinosaurs without O2 bungs. If you have the bottom end and fuel system for it your 2nd engine in the sig could go 130mph with a 6776 very easily and upwards of 134 mph with more wheel if everything was on target and the converter slip was very low.
vacuum 6
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2006
- Messages
- 2,410
Thanks for the 411. :smile: Currently I'm using TT, knock sensor and OTC 2000 (yeah old school). Once I get the bugs worked out of the new motor I'll be looking into the LM1. Who sells the LM1?
Innovate Motorsports. Innovate Motorsports Wideband Air/Fuel Ratio Tuning
I wouldnt go below .780 on the factory O2. Get the LN1 and then tune the car off of that.
I got most of what was available when i got it 4 years ago. The auxillary adapter is good because you can run 4 other 5 volt sensors and plot them with it. If you plan on using it only on your TR a Powerlogger may be a better option.
- Joined
- May 27, 2001
- Messages
- 10,866
Good work bro, you are making it look too easy.
Its easy as long you have the $. I remember being 18 and not having enough extra $ to buy a mild steel dp back in 95. I would squeeze the hell out of the stock turbo back then running low 12's through the stock dp, injectors, intercooler, KB high-low chip and worn out M&H Racemasters. Luckily times have changed and i can play a lot more now. I actually spent some money today buying a 4" pipe with MAFS so i can see if it picks up any. It is the first part i have spent money on for this car that wasnt gaskets or maintenance in over 6 years not including the shortblock. Hopefully it will pick up and i can turn the boost back 1-1.5 psi and still mph the same. I was told about 2 mph gain with it in a 125mph car. Should be a solid 25-30hp then. I dont need more mph on this stock bottom end though.
Underboost
Mr. Dull
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2005
- Messages
- 4,277
Bison
Are talking about the 4'' with the MAF inside that Full Throttle sells?
Are talking about the 4'' with the MAF inside that Full Throttle sells?
turboculosis
Pleasant peasant
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2002
- Messages
- 544
Cool.
Congrats Bison. Those times are almost identical to my personal best. Good luck w/ her. See look....
60'...1.623
330...4.550
1/8...6.989
mph...100.34
1000...9.096
1/4...10.881
mph...126.33
...@ 24psi as well.
Congrats Bison. Those times are almost identical to my personal best. Good luck w/ her. See look....60'...1.623
330...4.550
1/8...6.989
mph...100.34
1000...9.096
1/4...10.881
mph...126.33
...@ 24psi as well.
Thats it.
Cool.
60'...1.623
330...4.550
1/8...6.989
mph...100.34
1000...9.096
1/4...10.881
mph...126.33
...@ 24psi as well.
Mine is about 8.4:1 with the thinner steel gaskets. If i had a capped or girdled bottom on this thing i would let it go to 30 psi. I may run it one more time but i will have to switch transmissions and put in a stronger carrier/axle set up.
Underboost
Mr. Dull
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2005
- Messages
- 4,277
I have been seriously considering that 4'' MAF pipe. I'm right there at the 9.99with a perfect 60'.
This would be very cool to find you gained 2mph. :smile: I have a 3'' old Kenne Bell Pipe with a 3.5'' Granatelli MAF no screens. They say it's good for 1,000cfm I'm just not sure if that's on a forced induction car or not.
Let me know how it works
vacuum 6
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2006
- Messages
- 2,410
Yeah please let us know how the 4" pipe from FT works...love to see some feedback. Yes so far you are making it look easy.
I have been seriously considering that 4'' MAF pipe. I'm right there at the 9.99with a perfect 60'.
I have a 3'' old Kenne Bell Pipe with a 3.5'' Granatelli MAF no screens. They say it's good for 1,000cfm I'm just not sure if that's on a forced induction car or not.
Let me know how it works
Mike said to look for about 2 mph over the stock MAFS with one screen in a 125mph car. I doubt the gain would be nearly as much with a larger MAFS like yours. Even though your running in the mid 130's. Its around 1.5 cfm/hp for an N/A engine before the restriction becomes a problem. On a forced induction car it will cause a slight loss of compressor efficiency with the restriction but it doesnt effect a forced engine as much. Your over 1000 cfm on your inlet but as too how much it would give you it would be hard to tell without doing it.
Similar threads
