psycho6cyl
Ponies Are For Lil Girls
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2005
- Messages
- 1,908
Thats a te. ta is just a stock housing./stock appearing
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Since i'm a bit ignorant to turbos here are some pics to clrarify
thank you
D
It would if the converter was marginal. On the PTC 9.5", p trim, .63 Garrett combo i have it takes less .4 second to hit 29.4psi (or more :wink on the street with a 3-2 kickdown.
me tooSubscribed.
I should would love to see a TE60.
6031 would be perfectWhich one? 6031,6069,6076? Send one here. I doubt it will do anymore than a TE44 or a TA49 unless it has a larger than 31 trim ex wheel. The correct torque converter will cover a lot of sins when it comes to turbo selection.
Id like to see a 3255 vs. a te44/ta49 at 28-30psi. That would settle a lot of internet BS. On paper the 3255 should stomp it everywhere but i doubt it would spool like a 44/49 with the old Garrett .63 on it and my 9.5" converter. Its amazing the difference that small ex housing makes for the butt dyno test. Its very noticeable to say the least but will not show much on a dyno. I havent been beaten on the street in this car yet except by a couple street bikes from a high roll. It wont run faster than 11.30's on the street either even though a couple of the victims cars reportedly ran much faster at the strip .
you guys rule
have you guys done an OE 63 Garret VS. a 63 Precision
me too
6031 would be perfect
This engine needs more ex flow and all the turbos are no doubt held by the heads. This engine needs more compression too. The dyno is the same as any other dynojet without a brake and would likely be within 1% if the air was the same. 470whp=122mph@3650lbs.Otto, with the larger turbos do you feel the heads held you back? Is your dyno conservative?
This engine needs more ex flow and all the turbos are no doubt held by the heads. This engine needs more compression too. The dyno is the same as any other dynojet without a brake and would likely be within 1% if the air was the same. 470whp=122mph@3650lbs.
This engine needs more ex flow and all the turbos are no doubt held by the heads. This engine needs more compression too. The dyno is the same as any other dynojet without a brake and would likely be within 1% if the air was the same. 470whp=122mph@3650lbs.[/QUOTE
Did u get those numbers from personal experience or an equation? What would 550whp at a race weight of 3750 be? (my car with champion heads/intake and roller)
We started tonight with a ta 49,we could get no more than 26#s even without a boost line on the actuator(standard unit)
The TA 49 peaked at 385 RWHP and 441 Ft Lbs
Power dropped off dramatically at 4700 which we feel is due to the
convertor Brian is using which is suited for more power than the 49 could manage.
Next the 6265 peaked at 476 RWHP and 501 Ft Lbs at 26-27#s
in comparison
The 6176 Peaked at 460 RWHP and 480 Ft Lbs
All three other turbos peaked power at 5000-5100 rpm (which is where this convertor starts to peak) but power did not drop off but around 40 RWHP by 5600.
Hey Otto,
The 6265 what cover was it E or S cover, if S cover is it ported? What exhaust cover being used .63 or .85?
Thanks in advance,
Scott
Next the 6265 peaked at 476 RWHP and 501 Ft Lbs at 26-27#s
in comparison
The 6176 Peaked at 460 RWHP and 480 Ft Lbs