John Larkin
Sublime Master of Turbology
- Joined
- May 25, 2001
- Messages
- 5,013
Japanese automakers focused first on transportation, second on style and content. Remember how bare boned early imports were?
American automakers focus first on style and content, second on transportation.
That is the first flaw.
The second flaw is the US operated in a vacuum for decades. Japan is not a large place. They do not have the population to support the amount of product they produce. On the other hand, the US is a large place. Plenty of consumers with few options of what to purchase. US automakers did little to update their cars; we were stuck in 1950s technology until around 1970 when real competition started to arrive along with the first Energy Crisis.
The third flaw is US government regulation. Sure, cars need to be safe, efficient, and eco-friendly for consumers. But the US government invaded the automobile industry more fiercely that other governments of the world in their respective automobile industries. The result was US automakers ducking for cover and scrambling for quick fixes. They had nothing efficient and outsourced drivetrains into the poopy cars of the 80s. Ford got drivetrains from Nissan and Mazda, GM used Isuzu, Toyota and Suzuki, and Chrysler grabbed Mitsubishi. What few engines they produced domestically were so new that they were inherently problematic in the rush to market. So in short, the government drove them away from technology by moving too quickly.
Just my thoughts.
American automakers focus first on style and content, second on transportation.
That is the first flaw.
The second flaw is the US operated in a vacuum for decades. Japan is not a large place. They do not have the population to support the amount of product they produce. On the other hand, the US is a large place. Plenty of consumers with few options of what to purchase. US automakers did little to update their cars; we were stuck in 1950s technology until around 1970 when real competition started to arrive along with the first Energy Crisis.
The third flaw is US government regulation. Sure, cars need to be safe, efficient, and eco-friendly for consumers. But the US government invaded the automobile industry more fiercely that other governments of the world in their respective automobile industries. The result was US automakers ducking for cover and scrambling for quick fixes. They had nothing efficient and outsourced drivetrains into the poopy cars of the 80s. Ford got drivetrains from Nissan and Mazda, GM used Isuzu, Toyota and Suzuki, and Chrysler grabbed Mitsubishi. What few engines they produced domestically were so new that they were inherently problematic in the rush to market. So in short, the government drove them away from technology by moving too quickly.
Just my thoughts.