Turbotweak vs. Extender Chips vs. others

[jpwalt1987]

I have been out of the chip game since about 2000. I have another car that is gonna stay with a chip and factory ecm. What are some pros and cons of each of the different chips? Where does one shine above the other? I tried searching but havent com up with anything that really answers my question. The car will have some 60s, LS1/LT1 MAF and a wideband sensor. Let me know what you guys think. Thanks, Jeremy

 

[jasjamz]

I like them both but I use the Turbo Tweak chips. I send all my friends to him also and they have no complaints. I have one friend with a chip from Bob Bailey, the maker of the Extender chip, his car runs great too. I will be working on a car this weekend with a Gen II Translator and the Bob Bailey chip. I would say download the instructions and see which one is easier for you to work with.

 

[TurboBuRick]

X2 what Jason says.

 

[jpwalt1987]

Sounds like a good idea. Either one should be fairly simple as I have been using a BigStuff3 for the last 10 years on my other car. thanks.

 

[TURBOPOWERED68]

i am going to be buying one of each including Red's chip to try them all out.

 

[jasjamz]

i am going to be buying one of each including Red's chip to try them all out.

The car with the Translator had a Reds chip. I like the new setup much better. But how cant you when you step up to wideband tracking and the tuneabilty of various other parameters like timing, idle a/f, and so on. Being that you know the BS3, you're ready for any of the chips out there.

 

[SHADOWII]

You might ....

Really like B.Bailey's Maft pro as it offers tuning with or w/out(SD) a maf. I'm considering using it, myself.

 

[TURBOPOWERED68]

Really like B.Bailey's Maft pro as it offers tuning with or w/out(SD) a maf. I'm considering using it, myself.

been thinking about that too and the SD chip. SOO many options dam i wish i was a little smarter

 

[SGRIM]

Eric and Bob both make wonderful chips... Can't go wrong with either one...