EightSecV6 said:
Bruce, what is wrong with you?You mentioned DFI earlier....I CALLED IT A DINOSAUR and the stock ECU is a dinosaur too!What game am I playing?
I certainly never called you a bad guy.You made the comment that the DIS has been in the 9's I responded that I went 8s with it (so have a host of others).
What claims am I making that I need to provide a datalog for? I'm not selling anything, I have no idea what you are talking about!
My bad on the dino comment.
At this point, please ignore any more of the post, Norbs.
The stock ecm is just as current as capable as any of the aftermarkets other then the PnH drivers. It's the code that determines how well an ecm works. From what I've seen, my launch control is much more tunable then any of the aftermarkets, and it runs just fine in the stock ecm. BTW, care to see any of the *spool mode tables*, for those that like to do SCCA racing, and need the ability to have the turbo fully spooled for *say* being able to *launch out of the apex*?.
Once you get past the advertising hype, alot of the claims made are just rhetoric. Faster pocessing?, ya that's an issue of you during real time injector PW updates, but so far, I haven't heard any of the aftermarkets offering that. The stocker, and it's code are alot more well thought out then people are willing to give it credit for.
BTW, since you brought it up earlier, about being able to adjust you injector timing since going with a distributor. Here's how I do it, in my dino ecm. It's a 2D table and under various conditions I can tune when the injector's fire. Does that state of the art of your's allow for that?.
;*=======================
; Injector Angle
;*=======================
KINJAGL FCB 16 ;
FCB 32 ;
FCB 7 ;
; MAP...W W W W W W W ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
FCB....250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250, 250 ;
Obviously, I stepped on some of it, so as to not give away the hours of work I have it. Not bad for a $50, 20 year old ecm, IMO......
As far as the *game*, while you want to run a manual tranny, fine, but to drop into a thread with your concerns about what's basically a one-of, it's hardly related, to what a vast majority of people are going to be interested in. Not to mention the idea my treating my 70K mile engine like you're race engine. Using your ability to fund fielding a race car against a streeter, is hardly asking for a fair comparison. FWIW, I have every confidence that it would work with just a simple tightening up of the controls (remember in the log I did post, I was only using the timing control, and not the progressice injector drop strategy), I just don't have enough of an ego problem to want to risk ruining what's been a good engine just to prove a point. However, if you want to cover the costs of conducting and experiment that you've suggested let me know.
And after some thought the EST line interupt is hardly much of an issue anyway. All it takes is interupting the signal post ignition module, instead of pre module. All it really boils down to is 3 transistors, a few discrete components, and some code to activate an additional output.