What?... you don`t like my heater?:biggrin: Its the best I could come up with... winter is coming faster than usual
Matt; Yeah, I got it... thanks!
just wanted to make sure. so did it help you out some?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!What?... you don`t like my heater?:biggrin: Its the best I could come up with... winter is coming faster than usual
Matt; Yeah, I got it... thanks!
FOUND AN INTAKE IN GOOD SHAPE:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: Will upload pics later...
Holley Dominator Intake Manifold 75 bones.
What?... you don`t like my heater?:biggrin: Its the best I could come up with... winter is coming faster than usual.
bench racing time.
78-79 Riviera turbo 3.8, 4bbl, 1985 Chilton auto repair manual states factory rated at 165HP and 245 TQ, 8.0:1 CR.....
1982 LK9 V6 2bbl 3.0L FWD; 110HP/145TQ, 8.45:1 CR...
now suppose I were to fit the low port heads/intake manifold from the Riv system onto the LK9, and deck the block down a little to achieve 9.0:1 CR (or cut the Heads to get the same CR by having smaller combustion chambers?)
would it be possible to get closer to the HP of the Riv engine?
related question; how do i know which heads are low port or high port on the FWD buick engines? i've found references that it can use the 8445 heads, and other casting numbers; but nothing to indicate which ones are low ports or high ports other than years?
for that matter, is this intake manifold a low port type?
Quite sure the Cast Iron Riv manifold is low port style. I made OK respectable power without an intercooler but now that I've used one I'm not going back to hotair running gasoline. E85 yeah I'd probably ditch the intercooler.
damn i wish you guys were closer.......... its a blazer kinda evening...
no cars...
no women....
no bills....
no drama........
pack of white owls, fresh glass, some rollies and my Roy Ayers record.
gonna be one dead Oz'er
TONIGHT>>>>>>>>> Liquid Love.
A.j.
They were the same. The 79 Riv engine was rated 180 HP, the 79 Regal wasrated less. I don't see how the Riv could have been more restrictive with a better HP rating?
apparently the heads on the 3.0 LK9 had the same ports as the 79 regal turbo heads...this is from the guy who actually has one on a 1984 LK9 3.0L engine. the plot, she thickens more than beyonce!
ok my question now is.... why the 3.0?
why not a regular 231 or 252?
A.j.
sheesh man.... and i thought i was a bottom dollar hunter!
you have got your work cut out for ya...
A.j.
bench racing time.
78-79 Riviera turbo 3.8, 4bbl, 1985 Chilton auto repair manual states factory rated at 165HP and 245 TQ, 8.0:1 CR.....
1982 LK9 V6 2bbl 3.0L FWD; 110HP/145TQ, 8.45:1 CR...
now suppose I were to fit the low port heads/intake manifold from the Riv system onto the LK9, and deck the block down a little to achieve 9.0:1 CR (or cut the Heads to get the same CR by having smaller combustion chambers?)
would it be possible to get closer to the HP of the Riv engine?
related question; how do i know which heads are low port or high port on the FWD buick engines? i've found references that it can use the 8445 heads, and other casting numbers; but nothing to indicate which ones are low ports or high ports other than years?
for that matter, is this intake manifold a low port type?
its on ebay for $50. i;d suggest ya grab it just in case i cannot get it lol. (and maybe hold on to it for me eventually lol)