By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!seems to me that you would be wasting money to bolt on an expensive set of heads without upgrading the cam to get the air in & out more effectively. there's gotta be "better bang for the buck" elsewhere. i could be wrong, but i believe you'd be rather disappointed with your investment.
bw jones
thanks to all ,also would you notice any difference on the ported heads if you used stock size valves or is it better with 1.77
my mistake ....... it was late when i posted and i should have reviewed SHAWNZ mods in his signature. ............. an interesting observation, however, is that i've seen many cars with ported heads running little or no quicker than other cars with a stock longblock and the same mods. bw jones
This is just my view on the subject, why go through the trouble of replacing the heads and not the cam? Since the car is already down and all the parts are already off the car. The heads will flow better and a good mild cam will help the new heads flow more for very little extra $$ spent, considering the labor factor of where you will be at just for the heads. But to answer your question I agree that the stock cam will work, just for a couple extra bucks you will get more out of them.
For instance, I just port and polished a set of stock heads last winter $25 for the used heads(Im a machinist), back cut the exhaust valves, took this all to NAPA for a 4angle/radius valve job and to skim the heads flat, match the valves to there new seats($150 approx.). I found a new 208/208 Erson cam for $75 on this board, bought some new lifters and repaired the front cover with plate aluminum and a tig welder(cam button was rubbing about .05 deep into the casting). The car was down for 12 days, with me doing all the labor during my spare time.
Chuck
Coming from an automotive machinist of 7 years and a CNC programmer and general/prototype machinist for 10 years-
If you're a machinist, why did you take it to NAPA to get them machined?
Im not trying to be a smartass, Im just wondering if its because you're a general machinist and not an automotive one, and dont have the engine machining equipment on hand.
What were the final port volumes and flow numbers at 28" water?
4 angle/radius valve job? Whats that? Why didnt you back cut the intakes? Thats where alot of the low lift benefits come from. That and the throat work.
A cam is a good thing, but not necessary to get to where you want to be on a turbo motor. The factory cam was ground with forced induction in mind, so the overlap is kept to a minimum and the exhaust event is a little delayed to trap exhaust pressure. Its not perfect and could use more lift, but it does really well.
You mention the machine you run. Do you run 1 machine all day? I absolutely mean you no offense...your apprenticeship speaks for itself and Im sure this doesnt apply to you..just a basic rant...but something that has always bothered me is how some machine shop company owner will stick a guy behind 1 machine and make him do the same repetitive job all day, day in, day out...totally de-skilled mindless work and then he tells his employee "Yeah, you're a machinist". Like the movie "the machinist", the guy stands behind a drill press all day drilling a hole in the same part, day in, day out, then he goes totally insane. And then the world thinks that this is what a machinist is. A machinist can design, engineer, create parts (to sometimes extreme tolerances and most of the time within .001") using blueprints, he knows trig, geometry, algebra, etc. This kid I hired here had a really big head. Always a pain in my ass and had a big attitude. He was convinced he was a machinist because he was a CNC machine operator. At his old job he would read a program's tool list and load all the tools, set the heights and run the program, then pullt he part out and replace it and start over. His old boss never told him he wasnt a real machinist or a CNC programmer. He was a mill operator. He made 14 bucks an hour at that job and was convinced he should be making alot more so he quit that job. 14 bucks an hour is alot of money for a machine operator. I eventually canned him because his attitude didnt come anywhere near his capability. When I interviewed him, he wasnt answering my questions, so to cut to the chase, I handed him a print I made and said "if I hand you this print, can you make this part?" He said no, he's never done that before, but insisted he's a machinist.1st off, I don't want to hijack this thread, but I will answer your questions,
Here is a link to where I work, American Hydro Corporation : Home . I have my papers from the state of PA after completing a 8000 hr apprenticeship, way back in 1984. Yea, we do our own CNC programing also, except for the 3 diminsional profiles. My machine has a 100 ton rotary table capacity, 30 feet of X travel, 15 feet of Y travel and 89" of Z (The 4' square ram), the head has 270 deg. of travel (swivels from a typical HBM to +/- 135 deg.) So no, I don't have access to automotive machines, and the guys at my NAPA are good at what they do. The showed me the cutter that they used to do the seats on the heads, where carbide with 4 small angles and the end of the cutter has a radius(there really wasn't any part of the head that got hit with that, since it was ported). I do not have a flow bench and they offered to flow the heads for me, I declined. I'm not a pro racer, just a weekend warrior...
As far as back cutting the intake valves, not sure where you are comming from(I honestly don't know what you mean), as the valve opens the intake valve is already angled to direct the flow into the head. Here is a link to some pictures of the project Picasa Web Albums - Chuck - 8445 Buick V-...
The exhaust valve on the other hand as it opens, the valve body right under the seal is a huge restriction and of course got back cut. I would like to take this time to thank "turbofabricator" for his guidance on my maiden voyage!!
Chuck