Cal,
I get that, correct me if I am wrong but didn't he run two DIS systems when he eliminated the wastespark? In that situation he would have an individual coil per spark plug system, correct? 6 plugs and 6 coils instead of 6 plugs and 3 coils. Since the spark load would not be 2 plugs per coil but 1 plug per coil I do not believe that the potential spark energy was even close in the two systems. In fact I believe that the plug gap could have easily been made bigger as well with the twin coil system, with a nice improvment in performance from that plus the extra energy gained by doubling the system. Think about it this way. (Warning these numbers are for the purpose of discussion only) Lets say the stock coil can produce 30,000 volts, the amount of actual voltage it produces during an ignition event is whatever it takes to jump the plug gap, if it takes 18,000 that is what you get, if you stick a 60,000 volt coil on you still get 18,000 if that it what it takes to jump the gap. As cylinder pressue goes up the voltage required to jump the gap also goes up, when we reach the 30,000 volt limit we get a misfire, the coil cannot produce enough energy to jump the gap. That is where our 60,000 volt coil shines. In the single coil 2 plug example the 2nd plug that is fired during the exhaust event is under small cylinder pressure so the voltage required to fire it is small but still present this takes energy from plug 1. As long as we stay under the coil threshold we are OK, as soon as we go over we get a misfire. That is why I maintain in Jasons example system that there was more energy available when he was using 2 DIS systems and it is not just the simple elimination of wastespark that gave him the gains. As for current we will reserve that for anther discussion that is where the LS1 stuff really begins to show its stuff.
Mike