By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Weren't you bragging about being the fastest guy with 1.83/1.5 valves or did I miss something?
What do you think, bro?You mad bro?
Do you know of anyone who is faster? I'd like to meet him.Weren't you bragging about being the fastest guy with 1.83/1.5 valves or did I miss something?
Tony, I feel so sorry for you, I won't even say it. It would be like making fun of a crippled.Now that........... is OWNED!!!!
Well bro, you seem mad.What do you think, bro?
Tony, I feel so sorry for you, I won't even say it. It would be like making fun of a crippled.
It's sad to think, that's all you got to give.Well don... I dont feel sorry for you, ask for ALL THIS and ill give all you want !!!!!!
Bro! This is intermission. Who gets mad at intermissions?Well bro, you seem mad.
You sad bro?It's sad to think, that's all you got to give.
Sad? No. Why you ask, bro?You sad bro?
Get in line and give me your best shot,... Bro!Question, You made how many 8 second passes? and was that with a hole cut in the hood and with wheelie bars? I'm normally impressed with a quick pass but when someone runs their mouth and I have personal friends that run faster with smaller turbos/tires and stock hoods and no sissy bars. I'm going to give some crap.
Dusty. Did you really take offense to what I said about beating up on V8s?
Correction!Now. Take that estimated 1180 bhp at a PR of 3.0.
180 lbs/min minimum at 3.0 PR. Please take the time to map that point out.
What is the efficiency?
Draw a line from the first point we mapped out through this point and onward to the 4.0 PR row. What is the efficiency at this point?
Now come straight down to find the lbs/min for this new 4.0 PR point. What is the lbs/min for the 4.0 PR point?
Now that is the definition of scalability.
Correction!
The lbs/min for 1180 bhp would be a minimum of 118 lbs/min, not 180 lbs/min. Sorry.
No one caught that?
You keep telling everyone that. Pretty soon you might even believe it yourself. :wink: I think we can safely name you the number one troll for this thread. Congratulations.I think so much stupid **** flies out of your keyboard that most people don't read your posts very closely. Admittedly though, watching you pat yourself on the back for having an under-performing slug racecar is like a train wreck, I can't help but keep watching![]()
Correction.To answer your questions in order.
1) Progressively less increase in performance as boost was incrementally cranked up. The intake port and valve would become the choke point.
2) Ask a specific question and I'll do my best to give you an accurate answer.
3) 1200-1300 degrees F.
4) EBP to IBP ratio is .85-.95:1.
5) BSFC 1.18. Very conservative (lean side) for an alcohol burner.
6) The power is pretty flat from 5700-7800. I choose to shift at 7400 to save on the engine. ET doesn't change when using shift points between 7200-7800.
7) Peak torque is, without question 5700 rpm. The fuel table clearly points that out. This also matches what the sim has suggested. Peak HP depends on the boost level being used. Anywhere from 6800-7100 rpm.
8) No accelerometer data.
9) Ultimate ET goal is to break the chassis cert. 8.50. Not far from that now. I'll post the datalog of the 8.76 pass I did with the car. When you see the traces, I'm sure you'll come to the same conclusion that the car will beat the chassis cert as the car sits now.
10) The cars gearing is a little on the low side. Could use a higher gearset.
11) I feel the turbo is matched perfectly for the top end charge.
12) I've posted the compressor map before. At max airflow as the engine sits today with the small heads, I'm just a pinch left of being smack dab in the middle of the highest efficiency island of the compressor map.