By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Tony. The master troll. What made you finally come out from the shadows? You had to have been biting at the bit for quite awhile now. What took you so long?
Six years ago.
Ahhh! Finally! Someone is seeing the light. Thank you. Thank you. See?!!! Now, this guy knows what he's talking about. How come others couldn't see this when I was putting this combination together. I remember some saying it wouldn't spool until the next zip code. Finally. See guys. Some are coming around.
Or, you just knew it all along, didn't you, silly? You just knew it was going to be fast all along. You just wanted to keep it a secret. I get it. (beaming look of proudness towards its2qik)
Maybe i missed something??
Are you bragging, or disappointed?
Did you read the first post? I'm wondering why my combination is allowing an 8 sec pass with a 1.835" intake valve.
Additionally Don, you keep saying that the TB "experts" say your combo is "wrong" but you're saying its "right" because it went in the 8s? I don't know which experts you are referring too, but is it really "right" when it takes CH3OH, nitrous, wheelie bars, 29.5" tire, less weight, bigger turbo, etc to run .7 sec and 20mph slower than the fastest TSO cars? I don't get it.
its2qik said:Nice try. Everyone sees what this is really about... except for a few keyboard racers.
Do yourself a favor and stop drinking out of your buddy birdy's water bottle because your starting to sound just as retarded as he does. What exactly have you done yourself to justify anything that you are spewing? A twin turbo Mustang w/no factual data to support your claims? A corn fed TTA with dyno sheet that could have been typed up by your boyfriend, with no track videos to physically see if the trap speed matches the suggested horsepower? How about that Evo you enjoy ranting and raving about? Donnie clearly doesn't waste any of his time in any one of your threads, so stop wasting time in his. All of us "keyboard racers" get your point, and it is a moot point at best, so why continue? Dusty and turbo bitt are the only ones who provide an actual argument here, FryGuy enjoys swinging on both of their dicks while parroting, rather paraphrasing, everything that they say, not to mention going out of his way of "liking" anything that tries to put Donnie down, making himself look like a complete and utter moron. Has anyone here, or does anyone know of another car running the same numbers with such small valves? Leave the shoulda, coulda, woulda at the door, can anyone show us another car that accomplished that? If not, stop hating on Donnie, because he is the only one that apparently has accomplished that....
Do yourself a favor and stop drinking out of your buddy birdy's water bottle because your starting to sound just as retarded as he does. What exactly have you done yourself to justify anything that you are spewing? A twin turbo Mustang w/no factual data to support your claims? A corn fed TTA with dyno sheet that could have been typed up by your boyfriend, with no track videos to physically see if the trap speed matches the suggested horsepower? How about that Evo you enjoy ranting and raving about? Donnie clearly doesn't waste any of his time in any one of your threads, so stop wasting time in his. All of us "keyboard racers" get your point, and it is a moot point at best, so why continue? Dusty and turbo bitt are the only ones who provide an actual argument here, FryGuy enjoys swinging on both of their dicks while parroting, rather paraphrasing, everything that they say, not to mention going out of his way of "liking" anything that tries to put Donnie down, making himself look like a complete and utter moron. Has anyone here, or does anyone know of another car running the same numbers with such small valves? Leave the shoulda, coulda, woulda at the door, can anyone show us another car that accomplished that? If not, stop hating on Donnie, because he is the only one that apparently has accomplished that....
See Don. Your always taking a shot at other cars as if your so much smarter than the rest and you wonder why you get some of the comments.
Dusty and turbo bitt are the only ones who provide an actual argument here, ..
Dusty. Are you trying to compete with Tony for top Troll position now?See Don. Your always taking a shot at other cars as if your so much smarter than the rest and you wonder why you get some of the comments.
He's turning 1000+ rpm less. He's using a 3 bolt turbo. He's using gasoline, not methanol. He's using a stock block with a much less radical cam design. He's heavier than you were. He's using a 200-r4 trans, He's on 275/60 radials.
If he had a T4 turbine side, 1000+ extra rpm capability and used a oxygenated fuel he could use less boost to make the same power. So no it's not magic header design that's helping you as you try to lead everyone to believe. As has been said before. No one in this world can prove a pulse header design is worth the effort in a drag car.
DonWG said:Is hating on me that much fun?
So does this 71mm flow more or less than an old school T76?
I'm willing to bet,... mmm,... mmm,... wait for it,... mmmmmore? :biggrin:
So that means I was doing the same with a worse flowing, old school, Turbonetics T76. Interesting. Very interesting, indeed. And with less cubes, to boot.
Six years ago.
lol It's funny how all these haters make up these long winded, silly excuses to keep coming back to this thread. Is hating on me that much fun? Or, is it the hope of learning something new and different?
Not arguing at all. Actually, I'm very curious about John's combination. I'm sure others are too. He's doing something rather unique compared to a lot of others who over a wide span of years now, could not. What is different about his combination, where he's obviously outperforming a great many others?Since your memory is foggy, here's a reminder.
Your playing down your 76 like it was inferior to the 71 John is using without knowing how the turbo's compare yet you already claim your turbo flowed less than his 71mm. All this to try and fool people here into thinking your magic engine is doing more with less. I will say the compressor wheel is better but your T4 turbine will outflow his T3. Then you bring up the cubes again. Your engine is maybe 20ci smaller than his but turns over 1000 rpm higher. Again, trying to make people think your small engine is at a dis-advantage when the opposite is true. Especially when you look at the turbo's in question.
Oxygenated fuel, T4 hot side, 1000+ rpm higher rpm range, aluminum heads (yes that's right. His iron heads require more conservative timing than aluminum heads). You sure you want to argue your at a dis-advantage. lol You put on the show as if your doing more with less but those of us that know combinations know better
If you really think that is why you're wasting your time on this thread, then I hate to be the one to inform you. Dusty. You're wasting your time.None of the above. It's about keeping you in check. You slant the info and post so far in your direction to make it look like your doing something amazing. Those of us who know better help others step across the pasture full of bull crap and point them in the direction where they can pick up something useful.
If you really think that is why you're wasting your time on this thread, then I hate to be the one to inform you. Dusty. You're wasting your time.