By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!As I understand it , Gm made the Powermaster system for turbo Buicks because the vacuum systems didn't work the best for street use .So , why do the vacuum conversion kits work now - - or are they just a compromise and have drawbacks as well ?
They work now because the "information" you received is bogus. GM and others used vacuum brakes on many turbo production cars.
The most notable GM turbo car is the 1989 Turbo Trans Am that has a Buick turbo V-6.:biggrin:
In all the vac conversions I have done, all the owners have said it does work as good as the PM, and most like it much better.
I would not rely on your "source" for info and advice on your GN.
There is NO compromise or drawbacks.
does the vacum brakes hold boost on the line as good as the powermaster?for example 10lbs or better...
Nick - From experience you like the vacuum conversions .Which of the vacuum conversions have you found the best
since vacuum brakes work on vacuum doesn't that mean when you go from vacuum to boost the brakes would no longer hold/[QUOTE said:I use e reman booster and master cylinder from a 1987 Regal non-turbo V-6 which both come with a lifetime warranty.
In all the years in doing these, one booster and 2 MC's have been replaced free to the owners.
In answer to the second comment, the vac booster has a check valve which with give 2 or 3 assist stops without engine vacuum. So during the boost phase, vacuum is stored in the unit, and should also be stored in the factory vac resevoir.
anyone have any pictures of their hydroboost setup?
Here you go!