I see why people want to kick you ass and im one of them now..Gene, believe me, after your behavior on this thread, I wouldn't have a problem calling you anything I felt like calling you to your face. Anytime, anywhere, big boy.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!I see why people want to kick you ass and im one of them now..Gene, believe me, after your behavior on this thread, I wouldn't have a problem calling you anything I felt like calling you to your face. Anytime, anywhere, big boy.
Likewise, I'm sure.I see why people want to kick you ass and im one of them now
(Like wise?)I have no problems with the people on this forum like you do and im not your friend..Likewise, I'm sure.
Don't throw rocks when you live in a glass house, my friend.
Did you really write 'constructive criticism'. 'Constructive criticism'? Please quote for me some of that 'constructive criticism' that Gene so graciously provided. I'm dying to know what others are looking at, and considering to be 'constructive criticism'. What a joke.Gene I wouldn't let Donnie get under your skin. He just thinks outside the box. Which sometimes ain't all bad, but name calling sometimes is so childish. Just wish some people could be mature enough to take constructive criticism.
Let me spell it out for you. You have a problem with me. Not a problem with other people on this forum. With me.(Like wise?)I have no problems with the people on this forum like you do and im not your friend..
Now i do along with a long list of other.Let me spell it out for you. You have a problem with me. Not a problem with other people on this forum. With me.
You're in good company.Now i do along with a long list of other.
Next victim for Don to insult is anybody that disagrees with himDid you really write 'constructive criticism'. 'Constructive criticism'? Please quote for me some of that 'constructive criticism' for me that Gene so graciously provided. I'm dying to know what others are looking at, and considering to be 'constructive criticism'. What a joke.
Disagreement I can handle. Constructive criticism I can handle. Actually, I put a very high value on constructive criticism. The operative word there is constructive.Next victim for Don to insult is anybody that disagrees with him
Given the target bhp range that I gave Tony a few pages back, 1,530 - 1,580 bhp, and the past car weight of 3,301, I'm looking for a mph range of 171.70 - 173.86. I'm not sure how much weight this new build might add at this point. There is some other weight that will be going on the car.
The above MPHs are trap speeds. Not actual. The difference is about a mile and a half. Add that to the above.
I really doubt that would be some sort of record. Maybe hp/cid?
Yes with underwhelming performance. How many passes have you made running an 8.7? What were the other passes? I see no consistency.Do you build the engine for, and tune your big race car? And if not, why is that?
And no. I guess I'm not a tuner. I just somehow slapped a bunch of MISMATCHED parts together, used some very, very uncommon system elements, configurations and tuning strategies, set the initial timing (now, that there was important) and managed to get me a daggum 8. Hot damn. Imagine that. (said using a deep southern drawl)
Good grief!
I haven't been following this thread too much. I am still trying to figure out what you are doing. You have a very complicated engine bay, a giant turbo, NOS to spool the turbo, and you are .18 quicker than my street car with small valve GN1's (1.9 1.6), 3 bolt turbo, on gasoline, 26psi boost, "small" hydraulic roller grind cam (with solid lifters), and from what I gather, I am almost 150lbs heavier race weight on drag radials.
With stage 2 heads and a 91mm turbo, I hope you go high 7's@178+ to make anything you are doing worth while.
When I pop my hood, I can see my engine. I have been driving the car all summer to car shows, and only changed spark plugs once. 3 passes at the track under throttle 9.24 on slicks, 9.02, 8.94 on drag radials. 2 other passes that were aborted because of traction issues. I can launch on the foot brake at 5 psi and get 1.32 60's.
That probably helped actually. Kept from shrouding the combustion chamber. Not the detriment your portraying it as..Have you ever tried to do 8s with 1.835, 1.5 valves?
My combo or his???Would you call that a mismatched combination?
No not your combination.My combo or his???
My combo works well, proving you don't need big valve GN1r's (or stage 2 heads) and a giant cam (230+) just to go into the 8's.
My combo or his???
My combo works well, proving you don't need big valve GN1r's (or stage 2 heads) and a giant cam (230+) just to go into the 8's.
91mm T6 turbo, cam with high overlap, etc, 8.7's, it sounds like a dream combination to me. IMO the only reason it ran those times with such a odd "turbo" cam is because the backpressure is super low, resulting in slow spool up, but just hide that with NOS.No not your combination.
Hey I'm sensitive about my tiny turbine housing, so I cover it with a T4 blanket!!!!You also have a turbine housing that is tiny........I'm just amazed on the power your making, a true 8 second daily driver!