Anything new with the intercooler testing?
Yup
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Anything new with the intercooler testing?
Mind sharing, Lol!Yup
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw you post with the timeslips along with some pics. l noticed right away the slic. It definately is different from any past or present slic I've seen. Those times are very impressive with that intercooler.I will add to this with my recent findings. Last year I was running a CAS V1 best mph was 151.1mph , 8.9s in the 1/4. Didnt matter if it was 28 to 35psi boost. This year I switched to an intercooler with half the pass length, and it is located in the stock location. On 32psi, the car has already gone 154.3mph amd 8.75 1/4 mile.
I will add to this with my recent findings. Last year I was running a CAS V1 best mph was 151.1mph , 8.9s in the 1/4. Didnt matter if it was 28 to 35psi boost. This year I switched to an intercooler with half the pass length, and it is located in the stock location. On 32psi, the car has already gone 154.3mph amd 8.75 1/4 mile.
I saw you post with the timeslips along with some pics. l noticed right away the slic. It definately is different from any past or present slic I've seen. Those times are very impressive with that intercooler.
Agree with that,better to give up flow with a denser charge than to have more flow with a less dense charge.curious to know what the delta p's are after some testing,please post
Exactly right. Aluminum has the ability to soak up alot of heat. If you want to demonstrate to yourself how much heat it can soak up,cook some meat in a cast iron pan and note how fast the pan heats up before cooking and note how much hotter it gets during cooking as compared to an aluminum pan. The difference will be surprisingly obvious. This is why Red Armstrong designed a stock location intercooler scoop with a flap that closed off the incoming air during boost. The stock scoop just funneled the hot air that you find inches above the hot black track into the intercooler during a run. When he cooled the intercoller and blocked the air supply during a run,his engine made more power. He learned this all those years ago.You really dont need air to flow across the core going down the track. The intercooler needs to be large enough to act as a heat sink to absorb the heat.
Does it have many short vertical passages,or does it have relatively fewer and relatively longer horizontal passages.I run a Procharger FMIC because I got it for free!
Short vertical passages. End tanks are top and bottom.Does it have many short vertical passages,or does it have relatively fewer and relatively longer horizontal passages.
Why not a copper Intercooler?
Exactly right. Aluminum has the ability to soak up alot of heat. If you want to demonstrate to yourself how much heat it can soak up,cook some meat in a cast iron pan and note how fast the pan heats up before cooking and note how much hotter it gets during cooking as compared to an aluminum pan. The difference will be surprisingly obvious. This is why Red Armstrong designed a stock location intercooler scoop with a flap that closed off the incoming air during boost. The stock scoop just funneled the hot air that you find inches above the hot black track into the intercooler during a run. When he cooled the intercoller and blocked the air supply during a run,his engine made more power. He learned this all those years ago.
Pure CU has about 60% higher heat conductivity than AL. Tensile strength of CU is much lower and the ability to weld copper is not an easy task. I would bet no one makes a copper core either.
IMO; You may need 1/2" copper plate to maintain the structural integrity of the IC. I typically try to learn from areas where the budget is unlimited, like F1. If copper truly had an advantage they would probably use it, even if cost was $200K/HP.
https://www.flowkoolerwaterpumps.com/store/Copper Intercoolers/c300/index.html
This guy makes them
They use copper in a lot of other places mainly because it’s cooling ability is a lot better than aluminum. Refrigerant systems love using copper. And still do.
In a lot older antique cars copper was the thing to be used for radiators.
I could understand what bison is saying.
You want something that has low pressure drop.
Little temperature change from ambient.
Not heavy
And cheap to make.
If you could do all these things then that’s the winner
Aluminum
Haha yes exactly we can't have it all.Nothing worthwhile is cheap to make!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk