By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!The problem is try to "over rule" a class as it were. Just add it must have a "stock appearing bolt-on inlet bell" on the turbo. Something very simple and no I dont think Garys intent is even a mid 10'second class. Im thinking his intent is mid-low 11 second class. Some of the class rules now make them appear to be more stringent than even an NHRA stock eliminator class. The less rules the better. 4-5 simple rules and run what ya brung...
We may try one in NC with Shanes rules:
Weight (3400 - 3450)
Buick Regal (I wouldnt care if TTA)How about any original Turbo Buick or TTA
109 How about any v6 block that's not a Stage block
Small Journal turbo
SLIC
Current registration for the street
Thats it!!
That would encompass LOTS of cars currently on the street
I would like that class. It would let lot's of regular guys run and still be competative. I just added my thoughts in red.
Weight (3450)
How about any original Turbo Buick or TTA - check
How about any v6 block that's not a Stage block - check
Small Journal turbo
SLIC
Current registration / License for the street - check
There we go! Simple enuff....
Again keeping the rules simple is the key, no non-sense.
Sorry Gary, don't mean to hijack your thread sir.....
Pronto, if this class emergers will you come to NC to support it??
Weight (3450)
How about any original Turbo Buick or TTA - check
How about any v6 block that's not a Stage block - check
Small Journal turbo
SLIC
Current registration / License for the street - check
There we go! Simple enuff....
Again keeping the rules simple is the key, no non-sense.Even at that you're going to have guys running in the mid 10's. Other than a front mount, I ran 10.7 last year with a 3650# car with a 61 series turbo at 22#.
Weight (3450)
How about any original Turbo Buick or TTA - check
How about any v6 block that's not a Stage block - check
Small Journal turbo
SLIC
Current registration / License for the street - check
My thoughts so far:
-I think making a drag radial class would be cool.
-If you stick to ta style only turbos, you are going to leave a lot of people out. If you do smaller than 67, you are going to need to make rings and plugs for turbos. Also, you may find yourself having to have people pull the turbo covers off to measure them.
-3450 seems like a low wieght. Watching the scales at the ths events so far, the majority of the cars are all 3600+ with driver.
-maybe do a 7.00 index (1/8th) and 11.0 index 1/4 and be real liberal with the rules....as far as saying, everything goes, dot tire, brake lights will DQ a racer (this prevents sand baggers.)
At 3400 this is a 9.80-9.90 class with a 6262 and a 9.60-9.70 class with a 6265. Too expensive to draw any newcomers once someone goes out there and purpose builds an engine to maximize those turbos. The turbine needs to be smaller to keep the power down. Allowing a 62 trim ex wheel you are basically having the same backpressure as an old 76 p trim. The 65 trim has even less backpressure than the 62. The cars will go a lot faster than most would think. If someone wants to send me any small shaft turbo 6076, 6176, 6262 or equivalent small shaft ill make a couple passes in my 3500# blue car with less than 8:1 on 93/alky and show that those turbos are too much. That is a junk engine with junk heads and it still went 10.61 with a 60-1 from 1996. It was a T04S 60-1 but the shaft size isnt making more power. The only other item that would need to be changed is the FM. With the alky spraying in it isnt doing much anyway. Ill probably drop 10 lbs with an SL and i still will be able to remove another 110lbs from the car and weigh 3400+. I dont believe the 65 ex wheel is a small shaft but i could be wrong.It wouldnt be hard for a competent machinist to grind the shaft and run in in the t3 bearing housing anyway.Make it really simple:
A/C
109
62 or smaller 3 bolt turbo (small shaft)
3400 min weight car/driver
forget the rest of that stuff. Who cares if the car has matching rims, boost gauge, or 200 tranny. None of that makes it no less of a street car. I would stay away from street tires as TSR will have that in 2012. Simple rules means more participation.
I have a car ready for this classMake it really simple:A/C109 62 or smaller 3 bolt turbo (small shaft)3400 min weight car/driverforget the rest of that stuff. Who cares if the car has matching rims, boost gauge, or 200 tranny. None of that makes it no less of a street car. I would stay away from street tires as TSR will have that in 2012. Simple rules means more participation.
There may be someone that builds a purpose built car but so what, if there are 10-16 car fields and have to go 4 rounds of racing i think everyone would have fun.. I know the die hard ths and tsm guys love their class but it cant be all that fun to have a 3 car field.
At 3400 this is a 9.80-9.90 class with a 6262 and a 9.60-9.70 class with a 6265. Too expensive to draw any newcomers once someone goes out there and purpose builds an engine to maximize those turbos. The turbine needs to be smaller to keep the power down. Allowing a 62 trim ex wheel you are basically having the same backpressure as an old 76 p trim. The 65 trim has even less backpressure than the 62. The cars will go a lot faster than most would think. If someone wants to send me any small shaft turbo 6076, 6176, 6262 or equivalent small shaft ill make a couple passes in my 3500# blue car with less than 8:1 on 93/alky and show that those turbos are too much. That is a junk engine with junk heads and it still went 10.61 with a 60-1 from 1996. It was a T04S 60-1 but the shaft size isnt making more power. The only other item that would need to be changed is the FM. With the alky spraying in it isnt doing much anyway. Ill probably drop 10 lbs with an SL and i still will be able to remove another 110lbs from the car and weigh 3400+. I dont believe the 65 ex wheel is a small shaft but i could be wrong.It wouldnt be hard for a competent machinist to grind the shaft and run in in the t3 bearing housing anyway.
Grrrrr!Already starts. A new class with new rules (sure not too many). But it knocks out several more cars, like mine for instance that would fit all the above rules EXCEPT, I run a front mount IC.
Rules, even the simplest will exclude cars. That's why I always argue so strongly for index racing. It excludes no one. My car isn't all that fast (8.0 on a good track) so wouldn't be competative in this new class even if I had a SLIC. But can easily be tuned to run off an index.
But, not to worry, I'll still do whatever I can to make the event (tb.com nats) and support it in any way I can.
Yes index racing has no rules but they are already in place at most events and there are just as many people that don't like index racing... back to square one... LOLya'll want "the fewest rules" i still contend that index racing is the best way to go!!! No i don't mean bracket racing, i mean index'd.
Screw the rules.
You either run the number or you go home. As simple as it gets.
No box, index racing, nuff said.