* restrict t4 / V band housing to 68 compressor / allow up to 72 compressor with three bolt housing ?
The reason for the bigger housing being suggested is due to some guys wanting to step up their program. Moving the class forward is something to considered as well. THS had two cars that would have qualified in the middle of the TSM field.
But it also needs to be kept in check. What is the goal? 8.50s? 8.60s? Or stay at .70s?
I don't have the answer to level the playing field for everyone that enters.
And I only weighed 2 of 14 cars that were at or under weight. Everyone was over, some were way over.
I think coming down from 3550 a few years ago has helped these motors live, as well as made them safer
The stage motor penalty could be eliminated, but I want the option to assess and make changes if a stage car runs away from the field
I believe the turbo weight break could go away in light of the turbo technology available. 2 of the top 3 qualifiers were running a 68.
But does that mean bring those cars up or bring everyone else down In Weight?
This class is the only one with the wastegate rule, it's not a performance advantage, but more of a convenience thing. I'd love to see it change.
We need to consider the availability of turbos and how it affects us. The 68 wheels are gone. The options are not as many and people building cars have to know what to get.
I'll bring to a vote whatever everyone wants.